Archive I'm done with this site...

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Jul 18, 2012 4:16pm

It has apparently become a fucking joke. I'm sure with the plethora of new members, I'll be replaced and forgotten quickly...

[/IMG]

W

WebFire

Posts: 14,779

Jul 18, 2012 4:18pm

That is lame. The site is becoming exactly what drove people away from JJ. Maybe it just doesn't work.

DeadliestWarrior34

Posts: 3,101

Jul 18, 2012 4:18pm

I feel your pain bro

DeadliestWarrior34

Posts: 3,101

Jul 18, 2012 4:21pm

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Jul 18, 2012 4:23pm

SMH. I see somebody got power hungry...

hasbeen

Posts: 6,504

Jul 18, 2012 4:24pm

i would call that an unnecessary infraction...

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 4:25pm

I got a second opinion before doing anything. If you think it's bogus, feel free to go over my head. I wouldn't have a problem with it.

S

Steel Valley Football

Posts: 4,548

Jul 18, 2012 4:28pm

^^^^

YOU did that???

SMFH

hasbeen

Posts: 6,504

Jul 18, 2012 4:30pm

RDI corrected DW's 'their' to 'there' to be a smartass, DW throws out a harmless 'fuck you.' hoops throws out a 'you, fuck.'

I mean, RDI was being a smart ass, so DW responded accordingly and hoops likes to party so he joined. I don't RDI was going to be offended. The thread had already done it's job, the OP was answered.
Honestly, if you're going to infract DW and hoops, probably should infract RDI for derailing.

Is that little shit really what we need to be watching out for?

skank

Posts: 6,543

Jul 18, 2012 5:08pm

Chill out hoops, if people ran off everytime a mod acted when he shouldn't have, or, more appropriately, didn't act when he should have, there'd be about 4 people on this site.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Jul 18, 2012 5:29pm

What a fucking joke. O-Trap is becomming the biggest joke of a mod very quickly. Why is O-Trap even a mod? I could've sworn he wasn't posted for extended months and then he comes back, and all of a sudden he is a mod. GTFO.

Can't wait to hear the "oh we still haven't figured out the grey area" excuse from the mods.

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 5:33pm

skank;1228157 wrote:Chill out hoops, if people ran off everytime a mod acted when he shouldn't have, or, more appropriately, didn't act when he should have, there'd be about 4 people on this site.

Seems like if you let something go, someone complains that the mods don't enforce the rules, and that the site will go to hell. But if you don't let it go, different people will be upset and think the mods are turning into Nazis.

I can't speak for every mod, but I personally hate doing the infraction thing, because it inevitably ends up causing someone to get annoyed or upset. I certainly don't like that.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Jul 18, 2012 5:34pm

O-Trap;1228172 wrote:Seems like if you let something go, someone complains that the mods don't enforce the rules, and that the site will go to hell. But if you don't let it go, different people will be upset and think the mods are turning into Nazis.

I can't speak for every mod, but I personally hate doing the infraction thing, because it inevitably ends up causing someone to get annoyed or upset. I certainly don't like that.

LMAO... ok

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 5:36pm

like_that;1228174 wrote:LMAO... ok

As I recall, you got upset with me for NOT infracting someone because their statement was a general one about nobody in particular. Interesting that you got upset for me NOT infracting someone you reported, while this discussion has been about infractions that WERE given that people don't agree with.

I think I've handed out maybe 5 infractions the entire time I've been here. You just seem to look for reasons to complain. You're allowed. It's the basement.

But this inane discussion is precisely what I would rather avoid. Hence, I don't like giving out infractions.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Jul 18, 2012 5:51pm

O-Trap;1228176 wrote:As I recall, you got upset with me for NOT infracting someone because their statement was a general one about nobody in particular. Interesting that you got upset for me NOT infracting someone you reported, while this discussion has been about infractions that WERE given that people don't agree with.

I think I've handed out maybe 5 infractions the entire time I've been here. You just seem to look for reasons to complain. You're allowed. It's the basement.

But this inane discussion is precisely what I would rather avoid. Hence, I don't like giving out infractions.

You recall incorrectly. Thanks for playing though http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?35104-OC-GOAT-Tournament-Elite-8-(West-Bracket)&p=1216987&viewfull=1#post1216987.

skank

Posts: 6,543

Jul 18, 2012 5:54pm

like_that;1228189 wrote:You recall incorrectly. Thanks for playing though http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?35104-OC-GOAT-Tournament-Elite-8-(West-Bracket)&p=1216987&viewfull=1#post1216987.

No way, a mod that isn't correct 100% of the time? There goes MY whole belief system.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Jul 18, 2012 5:55pm

Dude WTF? You infracted that? That's total BS. Grow a pair and learn how to read context clues on if a post is infractable or not. Just use some common sense, also if you have to ask for a second opinion on if its infractable or not, it's not and you should let it go.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Jul 18, 2012 5:56pm

O-Trap;1228176 wrote:
I think I've handed out maybe 5 infractions the entire time I've been here. You just seem to look for reasons to complain. You're allowed. It's the basement.

I can think of 2 you handed out that were unnecessary. You're quickly becoming the new Cry4Fail.

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 6:03pm

like_that;1228189 wrote:You recall incorrectly. Thanks for playing though http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?35104-OC-GOAT-Tournament-Elite-8-(West-Bracket)&p=1216987&viewfull=1#post1216987.

Did you read the thread you just linked? All the Mods did was to tell the posters in the thread to "keep it clean." No infraction. RDI's reply was that a Mod saying "keep it clean" wasn't enough, and that the Mods should have done more.

I explained why nobody (myself included) was going to do anything (post #67 for those following along). Not sure how that makes me sound like someone getting his rocks off by handing out infractions, but that's a different discussion. You apparently didn't like my reply as to why at least I wasn't going to give out an infraction, per your reply in the next post.

So which is it? Should we have infracted? In that thread, you seemed to think so. Should we have not infracted this time? You seem to think so.

You just look like someone looking for something to complain about.

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 6:04pm

Commander of Awesome;1228194 wrote:I can think of 2 you handed out that were unnecessary. You're quickly becoming the new Cry4Fail.

Because of 2? You see that as so bad that it's deserving of a nickname?

Knock yourself out. Let's see what you come up with.

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 6:07pm

Commander of Awesome;1228193 wrote:... also if you have to ask for a second opinion on if its infractable or not, it's not and you should let it go.

An arbitrary opinion. Feel free to use it on any sites you have.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Jul 18, 2012 6:09pm

O-Trap;1228196 wrote:Did you read the thread you just linked? All the Mods did was to tell the posters in the thread to "keep it clean." No infraction. RDI's reply was that a Mod saying "keep it clean" wasn't enough, and that the Mods should have done more.

I explained why nobody (myself included) was going to do anything (post #67 for those following along). Not sure how that makes me sound like someone getting his rocks off by handing out infractions, but that's a different discussion. You apparently didn't like my reply as to why at least I wasn't going to give out an infraction, per your reply in the next post.

So which is it? Should we have infracted? In that thread, you seemed to think so. Should we have not infracted this time? You seem to think so.

You just look like someone looking for something to complain about.

My stance has always been to run the OC the way it has always been. This ticky tacky shit is just weak. It's doing the exact opposite of its intentions, and that is/was to bring in more new members.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Jul 18, 2012 6:11pm

O-Trap;1228197 wrote:Because of 2? You see that as so bad that it's deserving of a nickname?

Knock yourself out. Let's see what you come up with.

I didn't come up with Cry4Fail, he earned it. I can of plenty of failnames for you though, hopefully you don't keep this crap up and thus wont have to worry about posters pwning you.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Jul 18, 2012 6:12pm

O-Trap;1228199 wrote:An arbitrary opinion. Feel free to use it on any sites you have.

My opinion holds more water rounds these parts than yours does. Nice smug response fail. Learn some common sense next time little guy, and stop chasing our best posters away. Focus on dipshits and get them to leave.

O-Trap

Posts: 14,994

Jul 18, 2012 6:13pm

like_that;1228202 wrote:My stance has always been to run the OC the way it has always been. This ticky tacky shit is just weak. It's doing the exact opposite of its intentions, and that is/was to bring in more new members.

This may come as a shock, but there are posters who think the exact opposite: That by just basically letting everything go, the site devolves into infantile name-calling and useless threads which never end up having a point. They seem to think that will not attract new members.

Not sure where either of you guys are getting your info, as I wasn't aware either party had access to new member rates or unique traffic activity. I certainly don't have access to that, so I'm just not going to say what will or won't work. All I can say is that it doesn't matter how a site is run, somebody complains.