SQ_Crazies wrote:
3reppom wrote:
The mock outrage over stuff like this always perplexes me. coaches routinely go into the roughest, toughest areas of the largest cities in the country to find players that are prized not only for their athletic ability but for the way they play the game, with overflowing swagger and fearlessness. Then people are shocked and dismayed to hear that a couple of kids from those neighborhoods have done some stupid shit, that they might have been caught up in some stuff with their friends from back home. Is it ideal? No, but making one bad decision doesn't preclude anyone from the opportunity to make themselves into a better person. There are hundreds of examples of kids who have come with deeply checkered pasts, kids whose homes and neighborhood have torn apart with drugs, gangs and violence who have thrived when put into a structured environment. People can be upset over this, that's their prerogative, it's cool. But why the surprise? Is it really that shocking to find out that a kid from one of the poorest zip codes in the country might have a criminal record?
Funny how everyone that posted before you specifically said they weren't surprised.
Yes but everyone said they were not surprised that
Florida was recruiting gang members. I think if people opened up their blinders they would find this is nothing new for most schools, particularly schools recruiting kids from Florida, California and Texas. Off of the top of my head I recall several NFL players who were involved in drugs, gangs, etc. as a youth but got their lives turned around in college (and some who did not).
Everyone wants to act like their team only recruits the good kids from the suburbs. The fact of the matter is every team has or has had some troubled youths on their team.