1. Great rebuttal, really showed me with that one. He carried them down the stretch and it would of been a blowout had he not gone on a rampage in the 4th. Its not really even up for debate.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1206401 wrote:uh huh.. sure
He shot much higher than he usually does and they still lost.
lol wut.. he took many
When the **** isn't he? So far this series he's been their leading shot taker except one game and that game he had 1 shot less than Durant. By your logic the series should be reversed.
2. I didnt say they won, I said he kept them in the game which he obviously did, way to ignore the point again. And shooting 63 percent on 32 shots quite a few of which were tough layups/jumpers is not exactly throwing the game for his team which you're crying he did basically. Just because he plays point guard doesnt mean he has to play it like Jason Kidd and never look for a shot. Hes one of the best scoring threats in the NBA.
3. He shot 63%. What bad shots did he take? Contested layups? Most coaches will not complain about someone taking it to the hoop strong and trying to draw contact(and he even finished most of them as evident by his shooting %). It wasnt like he was taking fade away 3's or long 2 point jumpers while being double teamed.
4. I said they had a much better record when he shoots more, not that they win every single game he shoots more. Try to keep up, or stick to golf