Infraction for lhslep134: Rules warning

Moderator Discussion Backup 6 replies 27 views
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 3:48pm
Post: Site rules announcement (it's lengthy but required reading).
User: lhslep134
Infraction: Rules warning
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Seriously, we weren't joking around. We didn't enforce it the last time we tried to clean the site up. We are serious this time.

Original Post:
Mooney44Cards;1169072 wrote:Well before you post you should probably be asking yourself "Am I saying this in order to mock the person I'm replying to?" If the answer is yes, it's probably not something you should say. I mean "that's the dumbest ****ing thing I've ever heard", while technically not a personal attack, is hyperbole and adds nothing to any conversation. I'm not affiliated with this site, nor am I attempting to pretend like I know what the new rule enforcement parameters will be, but I'm just going off of what I feel is adult conversation and debate.

I'm not sure if I've ever seen a debate/discussion on this site with anyone admitting, "Wow you made some really good points. I still disagree though, to each his own" or anything to that effect. Obviously we don't want to all act like we love each other and suck each other off (verbally, not literally because some may be into that), but honestly, discussions just devolve into one side mocking the other, even if both sides have good solid arguments. What contributes to that? **** like "That's the dumbest ****ing thing I've ever heard!"

This is my opinion, and I've said this since this site was founded (of course, last time this was brought up a few years ago and I mentioned this, I was mocked and I'm sure someone said something like "That's the dumbest ****ing thing I've ever heard!")
That's the dumbest f*cking thing I've ever heard
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 13, 2012 3:48pm
And he should get another for the post about LJ.
wes_mantooth's avatar
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 13, 2012 3:50pm
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 15, 2012 2:42pm
This infraction has been reversed.

Reason:
Got a little heavy handed in the beginning trying to prove point, I guess. We do not want this to turn out like the last time we tried to clean the site up.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 15, 2012 2:50pm
Weird, it bumps these threads when you reverse an infraction but it doesn't re-send a PM. Anyway, I went ahead and reversed his since it was a little ticky tacky. I sent him a lengthier PM explaining shit. Whatever.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 15, 2012 2:51pm
justincredible;1172031 wrote:Weird, it bumps these threads when you reverse an infraction but it doesn't re-send a PM. Anyway, I went ahead and reversed his since it was a little ticky tacky. I sent him a lengthier PM explaining shit. Whatever.
You're a platter full of pussy cupcakes
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 15, 2012 2:53pm
lol, I know.