sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:19pm
Who had the best draft and the worst draft?
I think you gotta give the Bengals or Steelers the best draft. Worst draft would be the Seahawks or Dolphins.
Thoughts?
I think you gotta give the Bengals or Steelers the best draft. Worst draft would be the Seahawks or Dolphins.
Thoughts?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:22pm
Also the Rams had a great draft; one that will pay dividends for the next 2 years too.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:24pm
Also, if the Browns win more than 4 games next year I'll be f'ing shocked.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:27pm
Also, Weeden is a ginger. We burned a #22 pick on a 28 year old ginger system QB from a conference that doesn't play defense. Only in Cleveland..
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:27pm
As a Dolphins fan I don't feel we had a horrible draft, we addressed a lot of areas of need.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 28, 2012 10:28pm
Browns had the best and worst draft
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Apr 28, 2012 10:29pm
sleeper;1156549 wrote:Also, if the Browns win more than 4 games next year I'll be f'ing shocked.
Browns win 5 games you leave. They win 4 ill leave
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:29pm
If it weren't for Irvin being drafted in the 1st by the Seahawks, Tannehill would have been the 1st round's worst pick. And that's saying a lot because the Browns picked a 28 year old ginger QB, but at least it wasn't a top 10 pick.robj55;1156553 wrote:As a Dolphins fan I don't feel we had a horrible draft, we addressed a lot of areas of need.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:30pm
I'm not betting against my own team.bases_loaded;1156555 wrote:Browns win 5 games you leave. They win 4 ill leave
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:30pm
Cleveland Browns 2012 Super Bowl Champions!
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:33pm
Tannehill has talent and all the tools, just needs more experience. He can sit behind Matt Moore or Garrard for a year or 2 and I'll be fine with that. Plus he already ran Mike Sherman's offense so it should make for an easy transition.sleeper;1156557 wrote:If it weren't for Irvin being drafted in the 1st by the Seahawks, Tannehill would have been the 1st round's worst pick. And that's saying a lot because the Browns picked a 28 year old ginger QB, but at least it wasn't a top 10 pick.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:34pm
I guess we'll see, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Dolphins are picking top 5 next year too.robj55;1156561 wrote:Tannehill has talent and all the tools, just needs more experience. He can sit behind Matt Moore or Garrard for a year or 2 and I'll be fine with that. Plus he already ran Mike Sherman's offense so it should make for an easy transition.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:36pm
I won't be eithersleeper;1156562 wrote:I guess we'll see, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Dolphins are picking top 5 next year too.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 28, 2012 10:38pm
you don't draft someone 8th to sit for 2 years. That's not how a first round pick works.robj55;1156561 wrote:Tannehill has talent and all the tools, just needs more experience. He can sit behind Matt Moore or Garrard for a year or 2 and I'll be fine with that. Plus he already ran Mike Sherman's offense so it should make for an easy transition.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:40pm
I would rather he sit for a little while, maybe not a full year, but at least half the year. Then when we are out of playoff contention let him get some reps. Kid has talent he just needs to work on decision making.DeyDurkie5;1156565 wrote:you don't draft someone 8th to sit for 2 years. That's not how a first round pick works.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 10:43pm
Tannehill will be the starter game 1. Book it!
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Apr 28, 2012 10:45pm
Lol. The dolphins division is so hard to compete in that they can be good and lose 4 division games. Their draft was good until today made some mistakes today imo
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:46pm
Not a fan of the Cunningham pick?j_crazy;1156570 wrote:Lol. The dolphins division is so hard to compete in that they can be good and lose 4 division games. Their draft was good until today made some mistakes today imo
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Apr 28, 2012 10:46pm
sleeper;1156558 wrote:I'm not betting against my own team.
You would only be betting against yourself.
In other words stfu and stop acting like you know more than heckert
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:47pm
Also, at some point we have to address FS, if I have to watch one more year of blown coverage from the safety position..
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 28, 2012 10:51pm
I know 2 Phins fans and they both hated their draft.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 28, 2012 10:55pm
Best: Cinci, Philadelphia, Tampa
Worst: Seattle, Jacksonville, Chicago
Worst: Seattle, Jacksonville, Chicago
Non
Posts: 9,517
Apr 28, 2012 10:55pm
I'll give Cincinnati the nod as the best. There were some other teams that were strong at the top but the Bengals had the most complete draft, getting good value all three days.
Oakland was probably the worst. Their first pick was No. 95 overall and no real eye-catching picks after that.
Oakland was probably the worst. Their first pick was No. 95 overall and no real eye-catching picks after that.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 28, 2012 10:58pm
I mean I wasn't thrilled but I didn't think it was awful either. Tannehill, Martin at RT, Lamar Miller, BJ Cunningham. Egnew at TE from Mizz. We addressed a lot of needs and I'm glad we are taking a chance on Tannehill. Tired of taking these qb's in the second round who have mediocre talent. Tannehill may not be the most experienced guy but he does have the arm and a ton of talent. Olivier Vernon gives us another pass rusher opposite of Cam Wake.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 29, 2012 12:01am
:rolleyes:bases_loaded;1156573 wrote:You would only be betting against yourself.
In other words stfu and stop acting like you know more than heckert
Okay, everyone, go home. We aren't all experts, we cannot criticize or post our opinions on anything because base_loaded says so.
#sleeperwins