Big Gain;1136194 wrote:An one word immature for a moderator retort.
Ok, there are exceptions to everything. But in this case, Matta was outcoached. Same way Self got destroyed by Cal on Monday. As good as his adjustments were versus OSU, his lack of adjustments versus UK was comical.robj55;1136202 wrote:not necessarily...
Big Gain;1136201 wrote:I speak as spoken to, I respond in kind. I am not a moderator. Moderators should be good examples of what Ohio Chatter stands for.
Then ugly mouthed one how can another coach be responsible for his two leading scores shooting a combined 8 for 33? Surely a few of those shots were good open looks. Should the coach who is up by 9 at half time make major "adjustments"? I am sure a coach with a good lead at half time will tell his players not to let up, play with the same purpose, keep playing with the same confidence and remind his players the quality team they are playing WILL come out with a different attitude, will make a run in the 2nd half. I am positive this message was repeated time after time at halftime of games with good leads. What is missing? Players not responding to the message.Laley23;1136198 wrote:No you dumb ****. He was responsible for still coaching them and putting his team into winning positions. He was able to get the team to perform when the secondary star (and even Robinson sucked a few games) was awful. Matta didnt do that when his secondary star sucked (and his star was bad as well).
You blow a 13 point lead in the Final Four, you got outcoached.
You sure?Big Gain;1136013 wrote:I was talking about a player other than Buford. Ohio State needed ONE more player to step up. Obvioudly it wasn't going to be Sullinger, Thomas or Craft. The fifth option is Smith.
Big Gain;1135891 wrote:AGAIN...what part of your 2 best players going 8 for 33 and only one player on your team shoots 50% and he's your fifth option makes you terribly out coached? Awaiting the revelations.
LJ;1136212 wrote:Yep. Calling out annoying blowhards like you. All you do is talk down to people, call them an ignoramus, then you aren't even smart enough to use the forum software.
lol there is nothing private about you deleting posts.Big Gain;1136243 wrote:Your are a LIAR moderator. I DARE you to show where I called anyone an "ignoramus". You are TEN TIMES the "blowhard". You have TEN TIMES the posts. A member has a differing opinion than yours and you then you call members names, insult members, swear at members, talk down to members as you now are. Then the worst, you reveal private information about members that only a moderator would know. You a terrible example of a moderator.
Originally Posted by Big Gain 
You avoided the query posed.
Is revealing something about a member that only a moderator knows a common practice on Ohio Chatter? Is the practice something Ohio Chatter instructs their moderators to do? Should you self-report a misdemeanor or should I?
I think you should learn how to use the fucking forum
wildcats20;1136252 wrote:Reported Post by Big Gain
[INDENT] Big Gain has reported a post.
Reason: A moderator swearing at a memberi
Post: Ohio State vs. Kansas (Saturday, 8:49PM)
Forum: College Basketball
Assigned Moderators: Heretic, wildcats20, fan_from_texas
Posted by: LJ
Original Content:
There is no rule about swearing in forums, other than the high school ones.
[/INDENT]
Big Gain;1136243 wrote:Your are a LIAR moderator. I DARE you to show where I called anyone an "ignoramus". You are TEN TIMES the "blowhard". You have TEN TIMES the posts. A member has a differing opinion than yours and you then you call members names, insult members, swear at members, talk down to members as you now are. Then the worst, you reveal private information about members that only a moderator would know. You a terrible example of a moderator.
ob??? Could that be a typo like "an" instead of "a" was?LJ;1136256 wrote:Sure, when i am not ob my phone i will post many quotes of you calling posters stupid and constantly talking down to them.
Big Gain;1136260 wrote:Another LIE, show where I said someone is "stupid".
No, it would be misdemeanor.LJ;1136255 wrote:Its a misdemenor!!!!!
Big Gain;1136262 wrote:ob??? Could that be a typo like "an" instead of "a" was?
Big Gain;1136286 wrote:Nor did I LIAR. DID NOT delete 10 posts LIAR. All I did was when I saw "an" I corrected the typo to "a", LIAR.
There is no rule about revealing private information concerning a member to the public? A moderator revealing information about a member that only a moderator would know?wildcats20;1136261 wrote:You, in the last 15 minutes, reported 5 posts.
None of which broke any of the rules of this forum.
You do poor research OR you are a LIAR. I called a person an "obtuse goon" ONLY after that individual FIRST called me an "ignoramus". Go back a look again. I await your apology for this specific LIE.LJ;1136287 wrote:Obtuse goon
Big Gain;1136290 wrote:You do poor research OR you are a LIAR. I called a person an "obtuse goon" ONLY after that individual FIRST called me an "ignoramus". Go back a look again. I await your apology for this specific LIE.
Undoubtedly you would consider this "talking down". Not when it is the truth and am being LIED about.
Big Gain;1136288 wrote:There is no rule about revealing private information concerning a member to the public? A moderator revealing information about a member that only a moderator would know?