D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 21, 2012 2:49pm
With all the talk about the new weight classes..... I saw this on another site and found it interesting....
[LEFT]-----------------------Weights ----106 113 120 126 132 138 145 152 160 170 182 195 220 285 Totals
Division III (228 schools, 173 teams) 139 143 135 156 174 179 187 185 174 164 144 138 132 136 2186
Division II (189 schools, 169 teams) 141 141 149 158 166 168 167 165 169 162 147 139 135 126 2133
Division I (1798 schools, 165 teams) 142 140 152 153 156 163 159 157 161 154 146 142 143 130 2098
-----Total (596 schools, 507 teams) 422 424 436 467 496 510 513 507 504 480 437 419 410 392 6417[/LEFT]
[LEFT]-----------------------Weights ----106 113 120 126 132 138 145 152 160 170 182 195 220 285 Totals
Division III (228 schools, 173 teams) 139 143 135 156 174 179 187 185 174 164 144 138 132 136 2186
Division II (189 schools, 169 teams) 141 141 149 158 166 168 167 165 169 162 147 139 135 126 2133
Division I (1798 schools, 165 teams) 142 140 152 153 156 163 159 157 161 154 146 142 143 130 2098
-----Total (596 schools, 507 teams) 422 424 436 467 496 510 513 507 504 480 437 419 410 392 6417[/LEFT]
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 21, 2012 3:44pm
Huh!?
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 21, 2012 4:46pm
No biggie.....it was interesting to me to see how the numbers actually shook out after all the discussion/controversy.......cruiser_96;1092086 wrote:Huh!?
Don't know how they came up with the differing number of schools/teams??
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 21, 2012 6:29pm
It looks all jumbled to me.
It could just be that I'm looking at it on an iPhone. Because that what I have, you know? An iPhone? Yeah... It's sweet.
It could just be that I'm looking at it on an iPhone. Because that what I have, you know? An iPhone? Yeah... It's sweet.
H
huntergreen26
Posts: 226
Feb 21, 2012 7:33pm
Basically it makes it clear that the addition of an upper weight class was a huge mistake. The top 3 weights had the fewest entries, whereas the middle weights had the highest by a large number.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 21, 2012 7:45pm
The crazy thing is, the Powers That Be wont change it back.
B
buckeye32
Posts: 12
Feb 21, 2012 7:53pm
the middle weights really got screwed in this weight change
1_beast
Posts: 5,642
Feb 21, 2012 10:36pm
cruiser_96;1092213 wrote:It looks all jumbled to me.
It could just be that I'm looking at it on an iPhone. Because that what I have, you know? An iPhone? Yeah... It's sweet.
iPhone 1st edition is outdated....hoped this helps
Ridiculous....Less than 5% at all 3 weightshuntergreen26;1092268 wrote:Basically it makes it clear that the addition of an upper weight class was a huge mistake. The top 3 weights had the fewest entries, whereas the middle weights had the highest by a large number.
cruiser_96;1092277 wrote:The crazy thing is, the Powers That Be wont change it back.
If the walk out that Solon's coach has proposed happens.....make a statement....get on board
HUGE!!!!buckeye32;1092282 wrote:the middle weights really got screwed in this weight change
S
snugglyhippo
Posts: 272
Feb 21, 2012 11:42pm
If this proposed walk-out by Solon's coach involves wearing a crazy silky boxing robe and/or crazy socks and tie dyed hair...I am in.
S
Standoff22
Posts: 58
Feb 22, 2012 9:49pm
106 has more than 285 220 and 195 does this mean everyone will now bash those weights instead? 
C
Coach Geisz
Posts: 80
Feb 22, 2012 9:56pm
Well, if thats the case we should also get rid of the first four weights and the last three!!!
S
Standoff22
Posts: 58
Feb 22, 2012 9:58pm
From the logic people bring that seems right. Why not make 14 weight classes between 130 and 145 
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 22, 2012 11:14pm
Finally! A voice of reason!!!Standoff22;1093261 wrote:From the logic people bring that seems right. Why not make 14 weight classes between 130 and 145
