BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 12:46pm
They are Trademarking the name Blue Ivy,the name of their one-month old child, so they can use it for their own brand of baby products. I think this is a little rediculous
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 10, 2012 12:52pm
Brand names are protected every day. Some are the names of real people. Why is this one "rediculous" (sic).
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 10, 2012 12:52pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/09/blue-ivy-gets-trademarked_n_1266898.htmlBearBoy69;1082204 wrote:They are Trademarking the name Blue Ivy,the name of their one-month old child, so they can use it for their own brand of baby products. I think this is a little rediculous
Ridiculous.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/reliable-source/post/blue-ivy-the-trademark-feds-move-fast-on-rights-to-beyonce-and-jay-zs-babys-name/2012/02/03/gIQAOTDGnQ_blog.html
Reps to the Boutique owner.
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 1:13pm
If they wanted to brand name their baby because their rich and only want their kid to have that name, that'd be cool. They're just using it for money. It's extremely selfish. The baby was newborn, and Jay-Z shoved and effin mic in it's face, recorded it, and put it in a song. Ya it's selfish and crappy parenting. They're just using the baby at this point. The only love they have for their baby is the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ signs it producing for them. It's the cold hard truthqueencitybuckeye;1082211 wrote:Brand names are protected every day. Some are the names of real people. Why is this one "rediculous" (sic).
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 10, 2012 1:23pm
I'll defer to you on this as you obviously know these people. That's the only possible way you could know anything in your post. That's kind of cool, actually. Where did you meet them?
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 1:26pm
well since you know that i'm wrong you must know them too. Your argument ,in which you just got pwned, is very weak, and due to that that is why you posted this. Welcome to failcity. Population: youqueencitybuckeye;1082254 wrote:I'll defer to you on this as you obviously know these people. That's the only possible way you could know anything in your post. That's kind of cool, actually. Where did you meet them?
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Feb 10, 2012 1:30pm
What if Blue Ivy doesn't want her own baby fashion line?!
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 1:33pm
EXACTLYchicago510;1082263 wrote:What if Blue Ivy doesn't want her own baby fashion line?!
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 10, 2012 1:33pm
Where did I make the claim that you were wrong? You're all but illiterate and without question live in a residence with wheels, use internet memes only slightly less stale than a "rick roll", but at least you know some celebrities.BearBoy69;1082257 wrote:well since you know that i'm wrong you must know them too. Your argument ,in which you just got pwned, is very weak, and due to that that is why you posted this. Welcome to failcity. Population: you
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Feb 10, 2012 1:38pm
Hope they don't let Blue Ivy watch the Niggas in Paris video. That shit gave me a seizure.
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 1:38pm
obviously meme's make the man. AND LEAVE ME AND MY DAMN MULLET ALONE.queencitybuckeye;1082267 wrote:Where did I make the claim that you were wrong? You're all but illiterate and without question live in a residence with wheels, use internet memes only slightly less stale than a "rick roll", but at least you know some celebrities.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 10, 2012 1:41pm
Some of those Homes on Wheels can be pretty fancy and costly.queencitybuckeye;1082267 wrote:Where did I make the claim that you were wrong? You're all but illiterate and without question live in a residence with wheels, use internet memes only less stale than a "rick roll", but at least you know some celebrities.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 10, 2012 1:42pm
Some of those Homes on wheels are pretty sweet, I would not hate to much.queencitybuckeye;1082267 wrote:Where did I make the claim that you were wrong? You're all but illiterate and without question live in a residence with wheels, use internet memes only slightly less stale than a "rick roll", but at least you know some celebrities.
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 10, 2012 2:20pm
[URL="http://<a href="]
[/URL]
that's mine
[/URL]that's mine
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Feb 10, 2012 2:36pm
I see no problem with it. You can guarantee that hundreds of other people would be making a ton of money off of her if they didn't trademark it.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Feb 10, 2012 2:40pm
Lets hope Blue Ivy grows up to be ugly as Hell and can't sing a note.
password
Posts: 2,360
Feb 10, 2012 2:54pm
She will find herself up for adoption.chicago510;1082263 wrote:What if Blue Ivy doesn't want her own baby fashion line?!
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Feb 10, 2012 3:01pm
queencitybuckeye;1082211 wrote:Brand names are protected every day. Some are the names of real people. Why is this one "rediculous" (sic).
Reps.GOONx19;1082344 wrote:I see no problem with it. You can guarantee that hundreds of other people would be making a ton of money off of her if they didn't trademark it.
Absolutely nothing wrong with this.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Feb 10, 2012 3:01pm
That's a pretty awful thing to say about an infant.Tiernan;1082350 wrote:Lets hope Blue Ivy grows up to be ugly as Hell and can't sing a note.
S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
Feb 10, 2012 3:39pm
As long as blue ivy gets some of the money which I'm sure she will be hooked up for life then why not. It's not like having a diaper bag named after you is gonna have long term efects
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Feb 10, 2012 3:43pm
BearBoy69;1082257 wrote:well since you know that i'm wrong you must know them too. Your argument ,in which you just got pwned, is very weak, and due to that that is why you posted this. Welcome to failcity. Population: you
You lost as soon as you used the word "pwned". Smh.
On topic, I see nothing wrong with it either.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Feb 10, 2012 5:44pm
Good for them. Smart move.
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Feb 11, 2012 8:11am
BearBoy69;1082237 wrote:If they wanted to brand name their baby because their rich and only want their kid to have that name, that'd be cool. They're just using it for money. It's extremely selfish. The baby was newborn, and Jay-Z shoved and effin mic in it's face, recorded it, and put it in a song. Ya it's selfish and crappy parenting. They're just using the baby at this point. The only love they have for their baby is the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ signs it producing for them. It's the cold hard truth
R
raiderbuck
Posts: 1,623
Feb 11, 2012 11:56am
She still could have Dad's rap skillsjustincredible;1082380 wrote:That's a pretty awful thing to say about an infant.
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Feb 11, 2012 5:14pm
still stickin to my guns. no backing out now!