I'm not saying they ARE going to do it but think about this...Holmgren has never HAD a need to go after a QB by trading up...he's always had his QB in place via trade. He's also never drafted this high. The belief was that he offered multiple 1sts to go after Bradford. What's to stop him from doing it with Luck (at least offering) or Griffin if they love one of them? If you feel STRONGLY about a key player you do what it takes to get them (right or wrong).IggyPride00;1048714 wrote:I agree with everything you wrote, but it seems like it would just be so out of character for them to all the sudden start taking big chances like that when the model has been slow and steady since Holmgren came to town.
If they trade that 22nd pick, they have a new QB but still have no weapons around him and no running backs (since Hillis is being sent packing).
Developing him to be what they want is a huge risk, and I have seen nothing in Holmgren's 2+ years as Pres that tells me he is going to walk a tight rope like that when safer more sure options exist.
As far as "no weapons", why does everyone think that trading up and losing (likely) a couple of picks makes it mutually exclusive of getting "weapons and O-Line?" We're going to have a bit of a roadmap as to what they will be doing after free agency. If Heckert is lying through his teeth and they sit on their hands in free agency that will give us an idea of what direction they might go.....BUT, if they bring in 2-3 starters, say a legit WR, a starting caliber O-Lineman and maybe a DE, I'd say it's safe to say they probably won't be pursuing Blackmon with a high pick and the QB could be in play.