Reported Post by Red Rider Nation

Moderator Discussion Backup 9 replies 38 views
R
Red Rider Nation
Posts: 1,085
Dec 10, 2011 10:07pm
Red Rider Nation has reported a post.

Reason:
He posted a pic of me and this is offensive to me
Post: Buckeyes @ Kansas
Forum: College Basketball
Assigned Moderators: Heretic, wildcats20, fan_from_texas

Posted by: that_guy
Original Content:
Red Rider Nation;1010668 wrote:Hey Glorius Buckeye fans, what happened today? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA play a good team on the road and look what you produce! You wont play at home in March so enjoy the early exit in the tourney! You were never really in that game today! Let me guess its because Sullinger was out right? It would not have mattered. Kansas is better then OSU period!!!
This is Red Rider Nation, he looks to be at a Gibby-level of retarded.
]
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Dec 10, 2011 10:15pm
I know we have banned for this before and it should probably be taken down, but otherwise this idiot deserves everything he gets
wes_mantooth's avatar
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 10, 2011 11:22pm
I unapproved the posts that have his facebook account. I dont want to infract anyone...cause red rider nation is a complete fucktard and deserves what he gets.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 11, 2011 12:05am
LJ;1010700 wrote:I know we have banned for this before and it should probably be taken down, but otherwise this idiot deserves everything he gets

But in that case, the user identified didn't already identify his own self on the site. Hell, the dude has even given his phone number out.
Red Rider Nation;954673 wrote:Been there done that. Here is my phone number if you want to speak with me personally. 330-488-4462. Jeremy
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 11, 2011 9:01am
GoChiefs;1010826 wrote:But in that case, the user identified didn't already identify his own self on the site. Hell, the dude has even given his phone number out.
I believe dynasty never linked his facebook, but I am not sure if he ever ID'd himself. If he had previously, then we need to take same actions. If he hadn't previously ID'd himself to such an extent, we should leave this alone.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 11, 2011 9:05am
Fly4Fun;1010939 wrote:I know dynasty never linked his facebook, but I am not sure if he ever ID'd himself. If he had previously, then we need to take same actions. If he hadn't previously ID's himself to such an extent, we should leave this alone.
He didn't oust himself on the website directly. He went to the Ohio Chatter fan page on Facebook and said what his user name was.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 11, 2011 9:23am
GoChiefs;1010940 wrote:He didn't oust himself on the website directly. He went to the Ohio Chatter fan page on Facebook and said what his user name was.
Haha, great... an ambiguous middle ground. I would lean more towards these being different situations just because it involves two different websites. But I can definitely see how one would say they are the same because both websites are about the same thing.

Should we have a vote? Or just do what Justin says?

Edit:

After thinking about this more... the pages do link to each other. And there is something to be said about not posting stuff of other people unless they post it themselves first (e.g Gibwok).
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 11, 2011 2:50pm
Fly4Fun;1010939 wrote:I believe dynasty never linked his facebook, but I am not sure if he ever ID'd himself. If he had previously, then we need to take same actions. If he hadn't previously ID'd himself to such an extent, we should leave this alone.
This sounds backwards. Am I reading it wrong? You're saying if he had already posted his identity we should take action, but if he hadn't we should leave it alone?
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 12, 2011 12:36pm
I think RRN just needs decapitated. Problem solved.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 12, 2011 5:56pm
justincredible;1011219 wrote:This sounds backwards. Am I reading it wrong? You're saying if he had already posted his identity we should take action, but if he hadn't we should leave it alone?
I think the ambiguity is in my pronouns. I'm saying if Dynasty had previously ID'd himself on the OC, then we should take the same action here (As the facts would be the same). If Dynasty hadn't previously ID"d himself to such an extent, we should leave this alone (as it could be distinguished because Red Rider has given out a lot of personal information already).