Massillon at home

Football 70 replies 2,930 views
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 10, 2009 8:18pm
Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.

ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.

Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up

Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.

Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.

The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Dec 11, 2009 8:40am
They also finished yet another decade without a State Championship
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Dec 11, 2009 8:49am
skank wrote: Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.

ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.

Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up

Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.

Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.

The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
Alright, you proved that they can't beat good teams at home.

What's the records of the teams that they beat? That would be interesting
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 11, 2009 4:43pm
What team do you cheer for again rocket?
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Dec 11, 2009 5:34pm
Skank got his post edited by big gochiefs!!! LMAO

Atleast I am not the only one!!!! :D
Big Al Carter's avatar
Big Al Carter
Posts: 431
Dec 11, 2009 5:43pm
He should get banned.
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 11, 2009 6:01pm
Thanks for editing chiefs, I must have accidently hit those six extra keys.
G
Gardens35
Posts: 4,929
Dec 11, 2009 6:10pm
Ketchup or Mustard?
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Dec 11, 2009 6:13pm
Trojan
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Dec 12, 2009 12:29pm
skank wrote: What team do you cheer for again rocket?
Here's a hint

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 12, 2009 12:43pm
Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Dec 13, 2009 2:14pm
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
september63's avatar
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 13, 2009 2:38pm
Rocket08 wrote:
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though


Ive often wondered that myself!!

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 13, 2009 8:04pm
Rocket08 wrote:
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
That's funny, I have wondered why the privates enjoy such perks.

Amd Sept....you had better just concern yourself with beating Cambridge er, Mayberry, er, Hooterville. You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. As a matter of fact, when you had the chance to teach your kids a lesson and go into the offseason and work hard and see if that hard work paid off the next season, you balked at the opportunity, so, I guess we'll just wait until the next time D-over has their team of a lifetime to answer the phone call from your AD.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Dec 13, 2009 11:14pm
[/quote]

You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. [/quote]

Mooney has more big school titles that Massillon.

1 > 0
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 14, 2009 12:37am
calpreps has Mooney 34, Massillon 14 FWIW.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 14, 2009 5:46am
LMAO..Calpreps? Really? Lord knows THAT site is never wrong.
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 14, 2009 8:55am
I don't like it, people put too much faith in it. Just posting it--they have to play the games on the field but it is incredible accurate for a computer.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 14, 2009 1:54pm
Yeah..I put absolutely zero faith into a computer.
september63's avatar
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 14, 2009 3:59pm
Rocket08 wrote: They also finished yet another decade without a State Championship
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 14, 2009 4:04pm
Al Bundy wrote:
You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. [/quote]

Mooney has more big school titles that Massillon.

1 > 0
[/quote]

Well, if you were paying attention, you would see that I was talking about Dover having their shot at the big boy level.

1<22 Sorry
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 14, 2009 4:06pm
GoChiefs wrote: Yeah..I put absolutely zero faith into a computer.
That's fine--the score is pretty irrelevant. I said for what it's worth--if it's worth nothing to you then ignore it. But you can't ignore the fact that 80 some percent of the predictions from that site come true--not scores but outcomes. Of course anything can happen on the field, but it is pretty accurate.
skank's avatar
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 14, 2009 4:19pm
Unfreakin believeable, Nobody wants to count Massillons 22 titles, because they "weren't played on the field", now were talkin freakin calpreps?
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 14, 2009 4:21pm
Yeah..I know what you said SQ..was just putting my 2 cents in on what I thought of Calpreps and how everyone tries to use that to predict outcomes. Yes..80% might be true..but that means 20% are wrong. I wish Calpreps was right..b/c my Chiefs would have been at least Regional Champs. Lol and calm down skank..he said he didn't put any faith into it..he was just posting it.
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 14, 2009 4:36pm
skank wrote: Unfreakin believeable, Nobody wants to count Massillons 22 titles, because they "weren't played on the field", now were talkin freakin calpreps?
FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH.