I don't follow? "Attacking" your opinion?LJ;947284 wrote:Where did I say that? I believe I 100% specified my position on him by saying
So I guess to attack my opinion we need to start bringing up irrelevant stats on other teams and make up things that I never said?
vball10set;947948 wrote:Guiton is listed at #2, and this means that IF Braxton Miller gets hurt and can't play QB, Guiton will play under center, no matter if it's for one play or for the rest of the game...period.
it doesn't matter what I think, it is what it is, LJ, and "it's" that Kenny Guiton is the #2 QB on the depth chart, which means he will go in if the #1 can'tLJ;947985 wrote:Whatever you want to think
Teams will put in the older guy for a play or 2 all the time, whether or not he is the #2. Happens constantly.vball10set;947998 wrote:it doesn't matter what I think, it is what it is, LJ, and "it's" that Kenny Guiton is the #2 QB on the depth chart, which means he will go in if the #1 can't
thank you for dropping in, and it's called banter...that's what people on message boards do :rolleyes:jpake1;948096 wrote:I didn't know it was possible to bicker back and fourth about one play and backup qbs. Congrats guys.
Me too- trying not to get too optimistic, but man I'd love to see Beilema taking another loss.lhslep134;948283 wrote:So pumped for this game. Go Bucks!
me three :thumbup:jhay78;948295 wrote:Me too- trying not to get too optimistic, but man I'd love to see Beilema taking another loss.
If it was for one or two plays why wouldn't they just put Guiton in and have a running play with it? Why would they be worried about him turning the ball over for 1 or 2 plays, but if he had to finish the game, they wouldn't worry about him turning it over then? If not wanting to turn the ball over for 1 or 2 plays was the concern, just have Guiton hand it off. We may find out, we may not. Hopefully Miller is healthy and can complete more than 1 pass so we don't have to find out.LJ;946822 wrote:I don't believe that Guiton would go in if it was only for a play or 2. Not for one second. too many unknown risks. Bauserman doesn't turn the ball over, and that is all you need for 1 or 2 plays.
wow--how the hell'd you cop those? GO BUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ccrunner609;949108 wrote:I-O and I am sitting in the 2nd row..........50yards line for my first OSU game ever!!!!!
Maybe I should make a Ohiochatter sign!!!!!
sleeper;944840 wrote:If Ohio State wins, I'll buy every Buckeye fan on here a 16gb iPad2. Free shipping.
Book it.
He forgot to mention they're in C-deck.vball10set;949139 wrote:wow--how the hell'd you cop those? GO BUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do tell. What in my post makes you think that numb nuts?ccrunner609;949070 wrote:You act like e has never played football. He probably played for 12+ years.
Also signed,BigAppleBuckeye;949173 wrote:Dear Bollman,
Please roll out Braxton Miller on some quick passes on 1st and 2nd down.
Signed,
Every OSU fan
Repsjhay78;949229 wrote:Also signed,
Common Sense
Logic
Facts
Reality
Wanting to Win
Football IQ over 20
People who hate Wisconsin
It's simple. In a 1 or 2 play situation (let's say Miller has a button break on his helmet, you KNOW he is coming right back) ball security >*dwccrew;948845 wrote:If it was for one or two plays why wouldn't they just put Guiton in and have a running play with it? Why would they be worried about him turning the ball over for 1 or 2 plays, but if he had to finish the game, they wouldn't worry about him turning it over then? If not wanting to turn the ball over for 1 or 2 plays was the concern, just have Guiton hand it off. We may find out, we may not. Hopefully Miller is healthy and can complete more than 1 pass so we don't have to find out.
So you think they would worry about Guiton fumbling a handoff or something yet trust him to lead the team if Miller goes down? i just don't follow that logic. If it is for 1 or 2 plays, just run it if you are worried about ball security. And if they were that worried for 1 or 2 plays, I don't see them trusting him to lead the team to victory. JMO, you have yours and I am not saying you're wrong, I just don't agree with it.LJ;949253 wrote:It's simple. In a 1 or 2 play situation (let's say Miller has a button break on his helmet, you KNOW he is coming right back) ball security >*
If it is long term to win a game, we know that Bauserman has no ability and cannot win a game even with a huge lead. At that point it is a chance you HAVE to take.