T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 27, 2011 5:19pm
They said it is from the creators of 300.
I liked what i saw in the previews but when they said from the makers of 300 I am skepticle.
I have never been so let down by a movie before than when I saw 300. I didnt know it was more an adaptation of a comic and not what happened according to history. I had watched on the history channel about the real 300 event and was stoked for the movie.
I thought 300 was awful.
Think they will fuck up a movie like Immortals?
I liked what i saw in the previews but when they said from the makers of 300 I am skepticle.
I have never been so let down by a movie before than when I saw 300. I didnt know it was more an adaptation of a comic and not what happened according to history. I had watched on the history channel about the real 300 event and was stoked for the movie.
I thought 300 was awful.
Think they will fuck up a movie like Immortals?
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 27, 2011 6:07pm
Well I thought 300 was pretty solid. I didn't read the graphic novel and I never compare movies to books in the first place. I have a feeling Immortals will be pretty solid also.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 27, 2011 6:18pm
300 was overhyped, but still a solid movie.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Sep 28, 2011 12:35am
300 was great. Your fault for thinking it was supposed to be historically accurate. Look at the director, dumbass. He does a lot of comic book/graphic novel adaptations.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Sep 28, 2011 7:54am
thavoice;913278 wrote:They said it is from the creators of 300.
I liked what i saw in the previews but when they said from the makers of 300 I am skepticle.
I have never been so let down by a movie before than when I saw 300. I didnt know it was more an adaptation of a comic and not what happened according to history. I had watched on the history channel about the real 300 event and was stoked for the movie.
I thought 300 was awful.
Think they will fuck up a movie like Immortals?
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 28, 2011 9:16am
Why is that? It was more fantasyland than actually what historians say what they believe happened. 300 was nothing more than full length video game.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Sep 28, 2011 9:46am
Because it was based on a comic. Maybe you should watch a preview before you go see a movie. idiot.thavoice;914046 wrote:Why is that? It was more fantasyland than actually what historians say what they believe happened. 300 was nothing more than full length video game.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 28, 2011 9:50am
Yeah, it was my bad. I didnt know until afterwards that it was based on a comic. Hell, I didnt even know the comic existed and if I had known that maybe I would have looked into it more. History channel will often run a series when movies come out like this to tell what history said happen and that is what I expected.Raw Dawgin' it;914101 wrote:Because it was based on a comic. Maybe you should watch a preview before you go see a movie. idiot.
Yeah, it was my bad totally. I used that DVD as an ice scraper last winter.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 28, 2011 10:12am
Very few movies are 100 percent historically accurate in the first place. I thought 300 was entertaining from the beginning to end and it wasn't that bad of a movie actually. I also like the way they make graphic novel movies such as 300 and Sin City.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 28, 2011 10:41am
Yeah, I know that hollywood takes many liberties in movies, no doubt about that, but 300 was so far from what history says what happened.
BUt like I and others have said, it is my fault that I didnt research it a little bit better and know it was based on the comic book and not the historical version of what happened.
I totally take the blame. I know that some people agree with me but for the most part I am the minority that is for sure.
BUt like I and others have said, it is my fault that I didnt research it a little bit better and know it was based on the comic book and not the historical version of what happened.
I totally take the blame. I know that some people agree with me but for the most part I am the minority that is for sure.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Sep 28, 2011 10:44am
Personally, i hated Sin City, i wanted to walk out, but i loved 300.
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Sep 28, 2011 11:14am
300 was just okay for me. I didn't hate it, but I certainly didn't think it was great either.
The Immortals looks cool, I'll definitely check it out.
The Immortals looks cool, I'll definitely check it out.
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Sep 28, 2011 11:14am
I will agree that Sin City was bad.Raw Dawgin' it;914170 wrote:Personally, i hated Sin City, i wanted to walk out, but i loved 300.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 28, 2011 12:12pm
I really liked Sin City. I've been waiting for the 2nd one to come out for a while.