vball10set;893176 wrote:A whole lot of guys with another year of experience, but it remains to be seen how that works out..I just hope they represent well Friday night.
Great, another year of experience for guys who almost won the MAC. I just don't get where all of a sudden Toledo is "good" in the general sense of the word. I hope they do well against Boise State, as well (hope they win - it is no secret how I feel about Boise's schedule so any game they lose to stop the national title talk is fine with me). I just don't understand at this point how they've suddenly come out of nowhere (even going back to being "one of the two schools some said could beat Boise" that was posted somewhere on here).
dwccrew;893091 wrote:I'm not saying they are MAC teams, I am saying one particular team from the MAC is on the same level THIS season. I actually think Toledo is a really good team (and not because of their performance against OSU). As the season plays out I may be proven wrong and if I am, I would have no problem eating crow about it. Let's wait to see how the season plays out. Toledo is not as bad as many believe.
I agree with you regarding Kelly's comments. He is right in that ND didn't have as much room for error, but so what - they still made the errors. Not sure why he went there with the schedule.
And while I pointed out Toledo's results from last year, I'm not saying you are wrong...I just don't understand on what you're basing the opinion that they are suddenly a "good" team (not just a "good MAC team") if it isn't on how they performed against OSU. I mean, I get that they return a lot of people or whatever, but those people didn't do very well outside the MAC last year. Admittedly, I know little about them, so I'm curious why you have this hunch about them (other than the pretty good game they played on Saturday).