Divine intervention.dlazz;891272 wrote:Alright...90% has been accounted for. What is the other 10%?
Okay, so that should have said 30% ND's secondary being bad.
Divine intervention.dlazz;891272 wrote:Alright...90% has been accounted for. What is the other 10%?
Have you seen Wisconsin this year?Classyposter58;891245 wrote:That was one of the most exciting games I've ever seen...with that being said that D was awful. That being said Michigan will most likely win 8 games this year, Notre Dame will not beat MSU (btw the best team in the Big10 IMO) and will prolly only 6-7 games
sherm03;891336 wrote: But this is what I love about college football. People get so invested in their teams that a game like this literally breaks your heart when you're on the wrong side of it. Hats off to Denard. The kid is tough as shit.
And if Danny McCarthy isn't starting next week at safety, I will be convinced that he has taken out his dick and slapped Brian Kelly in the face with it. There is no other reason why he is sitting and those two ass clowns back there are getting all the time.
Yeah but I like the speed and athleticism the Spartans have on D better. Wisconsin really doesn't have too much speed on Dkrambman;891335 wrote:Have you seen Wisconsin this year?
I don't think Michigan State will be able to run on Notre Dame.Classyposter58;891351 wrote:Yeah but I like the speed and athleticism the Spartans have on D better. Wisconsin really doesn't have too much speed on D
Guess we better beat up on Toledo to make sure if we're good or notrobj55;891183 wrote:this
Yeah thats pretty much what I said about Kelly and his coaching staff after they lost to S.Florida.Tobias Fünke;891371 wrote:http://www.und.com/allaccess/
Brian Kelly basically agreed that they aren't good enough in terms of execution and that's what matters. That's pretty much all that really needs to be said at this point.
Eh, that made up for the phantom pass interference in the endzone on Michigan.karen lotz;891410 wrote:regarding point #3, that was Kapron Lewis-Moore. You think he got held much? (especially on the play from the Michigan 6 where he was called for roughing the passer?)
Wisky did look great against UNLV. Of course, so did Washington State yesterday. But Wisky did look good against Oregon State, too, just like Sac St did last week.krambman;891335 wrote:Have you seen Wisconsin this year?
killer_ewok;891440 wrote:I did hate the call on 3rd and 1 with that miserable deep handoff. Michigan ate that shit up on more than occasion last night. That's shit Weis used to do.
ccrunner609;891433 wrote:I was impressed with ND early and thought after the first QTR that there was no way UM would win but DR proved he was the best player on the field and ND's coaches cant seal the deal. Players made mistakes but coaches on their sideline dont know how to kill it.
Denard's receivers were freaks, all he did was toss the ball up and his guys went up and got it.Tobias Fünke;891361 wrote:I don't think Michigan State will be able to run on Notre Dame.
I think people may be taking too much out of the final quarter. That defense was painful, no doubt. But they did hold Michigan to three first downs in the first half, and 7 points (on another ridiculous reception) through the first three quarters.
Thank God better matchups are coming up. Denard was a freak tonight.
for real...if you arent going to use Robinson to the best of his abilities, then put Devin Gardner under center and find ways to get Denard the ball in space.ksig489;891466 wrote:Michigan coaching was AWFUL last night. Denard could have run the zone read EVERY snap but they chose o only run it 5-6 times. Too much first down passing. DBs playing too far off corners. NO SAFETIES on NDs go ahead touchdown. Its a good thing Denard Robinson and his WRS came to play or the UM coaches would have coached that game away.