That's 20 points higher than anything Tyler Perry has ever done deserves.bigdaddy2003;1220398 wrote:Savages only has a 53 on Rotten Tomatoes. The new Tyler Perry movie only has a 20.
Total gross is up to 341.2 millionbigdaddy2003;1220945 wrote:The cashier at the theater told me that a lot of people were checking Spider-Man out in 2D. I just read that it has made likev140 mil so far.
I read elsewhere that the 3D version isn't anything special. They advised to save the money and just see the 2D version.bigdaddy2003;1220945 wrote:The cashier at the theater told me that a lot of people were checking Spider-Man out in 2D. I just read that it has made like 140 mil so far.
prometheus and avatar are about the only ones where 3d is really necessary. I thought avengers did a decent job, but I could have done without.OSH;1221245 wrote:I read elsewhere that the 3D version isn't anything special. They advised to save the money and just see the 2D version.
Agreed. Avatar was beautiful, but the movie itself is a bit overrated.bigdaddy2003;1221261 wrote:I know I have said it before but Avatar has been the only movie that has been worth the cost of 3D.
Definitely agree.hoops23;1221263 wrote:Agreed. Avatar was beautiful, but the movie itself is a bit overrated.
As long as people kepe buying 3D tickets, it won't be on it's way out.bigdaddy2003;1221257 wrote:I'm hoping the 3D craze is on it's way out.
I'll probably go see Savages tomorrow.
A bit overrated is being generous. The movie was just Ferngully on steroids.hoops23;1221263 wrote:Agreed. Avatar was beautiful, but the movie itself is a bit overrated.
bigdaddy2003;1221261 wrote:I know I have said it before but Avatar has been the only movie that has been worth the cost of 3D.
I know. I was probably just being way too optimistic about it when the cashier told me more people were watching Spider-Man in 2D. It doesnt mean it's not doing well in 3D in other theaters. Crazy. 3D needs to go.like_that;1221368 wrote:As long as people kepe buying 3D tickets, it won't be on it's way out.
bigdaddy2003;1221420 wrote:I know. I was probably just being way too optimistic about it when the cashier told me more people were watching Spider-Man in 2D. It doesnt mean it's not doing well in 3D in other theaters. Crazy. 3D needs to go.
This.bigdaddy2003;1221261 wrote:I know I have said it before but Avatar has been the only movie that has been worth the cost of 3D.
