MLB: 7/26 games

vBookie 20 replies 426 views
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:00am
Tuesday
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jul 26, 2011 9:48am
Holy Moses, thats alot of games!!
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jul 26, 2011 10:30am
I will either ride the Pirates into contention or obscurity.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 10:37am
Maybe I'll throw a big number on them to make sure they lose.....and you as well
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jul 26, 2011 10:43am
Now that would just be cruel.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 10:46am
For 3000 I could probably take them down.....that and Hansen is pretty darn good.
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 10:47am
Who?
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 11:04am
There have been more Hansen's in baseball than Hanson's....when he reaches worthiness I'll get his name right everytime. Families need not argue and change their names slightly to piss others off....causes misspellings down the road.

Brandon Larson, Branden Larson, Brandon Larsen, Branden Larsen was the worst.
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 11:06am
:)

If he is good enough to be Cincinnati's #1, shouldn't he be worthy?
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Jul 26, 2011 11:08am
Lason was a 4A hitter.

A total disappointment
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 11:10am
lol....please tell me you did that on purpose to help my esteem
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 11:12am
karen lotz;841523 wrote::)

If he is good enough to be Cincinnati's #1, shouldn't he be worthy?
Nope....not yet, unless his name is Ed Ott.....or maybe Ed Ought.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Jul 26, 2011 12:01pm
Um. Yeah. Sure. I did that in purpose
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Jul 26, 2011 12:01pm
Ironman92;841537 wrote:Nope....not yet, unless his name is Ed Ott.....or maybe Ed Ought.

Ed Ought was a meaty-oakre pre madonna.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Jul 26, 2011 12:02pm
Someone is pretty confident on the pirates.


I think that the sign of the apocalypse
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jul 26, 2011 12:14pm
Ironman92;841494 wrote:For 3000 I could probably take them down.....that and Hansen is pretty darn good.

Yeah, but so far this year in the National League, Karstens has been unreal. Unfortunately, he doesn't always get help, as in his loss to the Reds last week, when two errors and only one run of support hurt him. The team owes him a win after that.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 1:02pm
OK..I'm in.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 26, 2011 7:36pm
Pirates 3 hits and 2 runs in the first off of Hansun.
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jul 27, 2011 8:25am
screw you indians!
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jul 27, 2011 12:27pm
I blame you for this Ironman. You made the game go 19 innings, you made the ump botch an easy call, you cost me any shot at contention for the vCash Cup.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jul 27, 2011 12:51pm
Typically when I bet over 2000 stupid shit happens to keep me from winning.....it's funny. That game the other night I had 4000 on the ending time and it was going to make it easily and then the Braves made 5 outs on 9 pitches versus Aroldis Chapman (I think you're supposed to make him work?) and then the Reds nearly matched it and 1 pitch in the bottom of the 9th....over, out 4,000.....and the HR cost me 8000....but the 4,000 had some very crazy happenings.

You still have 15,000+......I'll put 5,000 on the Mets and you go opposite with the Reds and get most of your money back.