Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Officer Down... Literally.

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ Officer Down... Literally.
DeadliestWarrior34's avatar

DeadliestWarrior34

gooby pls

3,101 posts
Jun 7, 2011 7:39 PM
SMH
Jun 7, 2011 7:39pm
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Jun 7, 2011 8:06 PM
He definitely screwed up by not notifying dispatch. Sounds like a stern verbal reminder would be in order. Definitely should not have been fired. Unless there is a history of these types of screw ups.
Jun 7, 2011 8:06pm
sonofsam's avatar

sonofsam

Wee' Gonna Win..

2,052 posts
Jun 7, 2011 8:36 PM
majorspark;793550 wrote:He definitely screwed up by not notifying dispatch. Sounds like a stern verbal reminder would be in order. Definitely should not have been fired. Unless there is a history of these types of screw ups.

I think the story ended in the correct punishment... It should be a learning experience, not a reason to fire a seasoned police officer who acted in response of shots fired and two cops down.
Jun 7, 2011 8:36pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jun 7, 2011 8:41 PM
sonofsam;793604 wrote:I think the story ended in the correct punishment... It should be a learning experience, not a reason to fire a seasoned police officer who acted in response of shots fired and two cops down.

???? So he should've been fired, but it should'nt have been a reason to fire him??
Jun 7, 2011 8:41pm
Sykotyk's avatar

Sykotyk

Senior Member

1,155 posts
Jun 7, 2011 9:10 PM
se-alum;793611 wrote:???? So he should've been fired, but it should'nt have been a reason to fire him??

No, he means the punishment that was suggested by the last quoted in the article, that he be reprimanded only unless he had a history of failing to be where he said he was, etc.
Jun 7, 2011 9:10pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jun 7, 2011 9:54 PM
Sykotyk;793639 wrote:No, he means the punishment that was suggested by the last quoted in the article, that he be reprimanded only unless he had a history of failing to be where he said he was, etc.

Gotcha....lol...I was confused!
Jun 7, 2011 9:54pm
sonofsam's avatar

sonofsam

Wee' Gonna Win..

2,052 posts
Jun 7, 2011 9:55 PM
Sykotyk;793639 wrote:No, he means the punishment that was suggested by the last quoted in the article, that he be reprimanded only unless he had a history of failing to be where he said he was, etc.

Yes, this. Sorry to confuse.
Jun 7, 2011 9:55pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Jun 7, 2011 11:04 PM
This doesnt surprise me at all since i am working for both a univeristy and city PD.
Jun 7, 2011 11:04pm