Speedofsand;808273 wrote:http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/issues/enforcement
Wow that's a reach. Florida is nowhere in that link.sleeper;808287 wrote:So Florida paid off the NCAA?
Writerbuckeye;808547 wrote:From your own link:
If the source anonymously reported the potential violation, the NCAA enforcement staff cannot use the information to prove a violation occurred, but they can use the information to find others who may have information about the situation.
Speedofsand;808629 wrote:Wow that's a reach. Florida is nowhere in that link.
sleeper;808650 wrote:There's no other way to explain Florida not being given the death penalty.
enigmaax;808931 wrote:There's only one school with an upcoming hearing that faces the "repeat offender" status, which is necessary for the death penalty. What do you think they should request for a last meal....Akron?
Midstate01;808942 wrote:Lol, death penalty?? Osu is nowhere near the death penalty. Don't try to act like they are.
Florida has had like 30+ arrests in the last few years and nobody even mentions it. Kids sell their own items and people talk death penalty. Gtfo
enigmaax;809026 wrote:1. They qualify. They will be considered a "repeat offender". That is exactly why the death penalty was created. It is a fact. Didn't say they were going to get it, other than joking (please see the post to which I responded...it's quoted), but it is factually accurate to say they qualify.
2. As Writer explained, arrests have nothing to do with the death penalty. At all.
Duh. Did you see who brought up the death penalty on this thread and why I said that?WebFire;809092 wrote: Whether they "qualify" or not, they won't come close to the death penalty.
It is already a consideration, the NCAA stated it in the letter.WebFire;809092 wrote: It's questionable whether repeat offender will even be a consideration.
CLEVELAND -- The Browns are intrigued enough by former Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor to do their due diligence on him for the supplemental draft, a league source told The Plain Dealer.
j_crazy;810949 wrote:lol, clowns.
Writerbuckeye;811080 wrote:So an NFL team is a bunch of "clowns" for doing their job and checking out a supplemental draft player -- and one that's a freakish athlete at that?
Seems to me they would be inept if they DIDN'T do as much research as possible before making a decision one way or another.
Writerbuckeye;811080 wrote:So an NFL team is a bunch of "clowns" for doing their job and checking out a supplemental draft player -- and one that's a freakish athlete at that?
Seems to me they would be inept if they DIDN'T do as much research as possible before making a decision one way or another.
j_crazy;811481 wrote:given the browns' recent successes with QB's (or lack thereof) i'd say their interest in him solidifies him as a future non factor in the NFL.
Tiernan;811059 wrote:Its still only "One Lie" as far as any provable & punishable violations go. Does anyone really think a coach with Tress' record would have been let go for what he did if he coached in the SEC or PAC12? No F'n way! The car thing has been proved to be a big zero nothing. The selling of memorabilia has been decided with the 5 game suspensions. The only thing still lingering are the possible drug implications when the FBI's indictments on the Tattoo Parlor Owner finally come down.
So you agree with me by shaking your head "No...he definitely would not have been let go in the SEC or PAC12". Thanks for confirming.Tobias Fünke;811511 wrote:lulz
j_crazy;811481 wrote:given the browns' recent successes with QB's (or lack thereof) i'd say their interest in him solidifies him as a future non factor in the NFL.
Speedofsand;808629 wrote:Wow that's a reach. Florida is nowhere in that link.
What's your point?
You are as bad as sleeper, vball, durkie, etc.
