NCAA denies USC's appeal

Home Archive College Sports NCAA denies USC's appeal
gorocks99's avatar

gorocks99

Senior Member

10,760 posts
May 25, 2011 5:24 PM
The Trojans football team will be allowed to sign no more than 15 players to scholarships for the next three seasons (against a top limit of 25 for schools not under sanction).
Enjoy it, Lane Violation.
May 25, 2011 5:24pm
sherm03's avatar

sherm03

I go balls deep.

7,349 posts
May 25, 2011 6:44 PM
Dear USC,



Signed,
College Football Fans
May 25, 2011 6:44pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
May 25, 2011 6:49 PM
Sad. USC, at its peak, was unstoppable.

And they never negligently killed anyone.
May 25, 2011 6:49pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
May 25, 2011 7:14 PM
sleeper;780608 wrote:Sad. USC, at its peak, was unstoppable.

And they never negligently killed anyone.
Vince Young did a pretty good job against them.....
May 25, 2011 7:14pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
May 25, 2011 7:59 PM
wow...can OSU be next?
May 25, 2011 7:59pm
Tobias Fünke's avatar

Tobias Fünke

formerly "sjmvsfscs08"

2,387 posts
May 25, 2011 8:25 PM
What does this mean to their signed recruiting class?
May 25, 2011 8:25pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 25, 2011 8:33 PM
Tobias Fünke;780737 wrote:What does this mean to their signed recruiting class?
Nothing. Lane found loopholes that allowed him to sign 30 recruits. Since the scholarship restrictions were being appealed when Signing Day rolled around, SC was able to sign more than the imposed 15 max. I think he was able to sign more than 25 because 5 of them were early enrollees that don't count against the years numbers.

Since there is a post season ban for this coming season, all seniors are able to transfer to any program they want and will be eligible to play immediately, I believe.
May 25, 2011 8:33pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
May 25, 2011 9:17 PM
vball10set;780706 wrote:wow...can OSU be next?

hope not
May 25, 2011 9:17pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
May 25, 2011 9:38 PM
Tobias Fünke;780737 wrote:What does this mean to their signed recruiting class?

Lots of playing time and fewer underclassmen challenging them for their starting spot the next few years. Also means NO depth on Lane's roster.
May 25, 2011 9:38pm
Tobias Fünke's avatar

Tobias Fünke

formerly "sjmvsfscs08"

2,387 posts
May 25, 2011 9:40 PM
I heard USC only has enough room to sign nine recruits this year. Fuckin' nice. :)
May 25, 2011 9:40pm
S

Sonofanump

May 25, 2011 10:58 PM
At least that one poster has Duke basketball to look forward to...
May 25, 2011 10:58pm
Y-Town Steelhound's avatar

Y-Town Steelhound

Underrated

1,388 posts
May 26, 2011 8:17 AM
Can't say I'm surprised. The NCAA dished out the ruling so I can't see them overturning it. One would assume OSU's won't be as harsh given that they did not receive LOIC in their charges.
May 26, 2011 8:17am
Scarlet_Buckeye's avatar

Scarlet_Buckeye

Senior Member

5,264 posts
May 26, 2011 12:52 PM
sherm03;780596 wrote:


#This.


But hopefully not this...
vball10set;780706 wrote:wow...can OSU be next?
May 26, 2011 12:52pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
May 26, 2011 1:55 PM
^^^agreed
May 26, 2011 1:55pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
May 26, 2011 3:16 PM
Given how blatantly USC stalled the NCAA -- this is a fitting end.

People forget that unlike USC, Ohio State has invited the NCAA to Columbus to try and put this matter to bed as quickly as possible.

USC showed nothing but arrogance and hubris for years while all the allegations were flying, and even to a degree after the NCAA started actively investigating.

I do find it interesting that the media has all but ignored this story as it continues to pound Tressel and Ohio State, much like they almost universally ignored the allegations for years while they (mostly ESPN) were busy slobbering all over Cheaty McPetey's knob.
May 26, 2011 3:16pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 26, 2011 3:22 PM
Why should ESPN spend more time on the NCAA denying the appeal, which everyone outside of Troy knew was going to happen, when there is a relatively newer and bigger story out now?
May 26, 2011 3:22pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
May 26, 2011 4:27 PM
karen lotz;782085 wrote:Why should ESPN spend more time on the NCAA denying the appeal, which everyone outside of Troy knew was going to happen, when there is a relatively newer and bigger story out now?

Oh I don't know -- perhaps because it was/is one of the premiere programs in the country and was everyone's favorite team/coach for about 5 years or so. Then again, they all basically ignored the story as it was unfolding, so why bother to cover it now. SMH
May 26, 2011 4:27pm