Republican candidates for 2012

Home Archive Politics Republican candidates for 2012
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Dec 2, 2011 5:51 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/jon-huntsman-skip-presidential-debate-moderated-donald-trump-201000365.html

Donald Trump now moderating Debates this month. This is quite pathetic honestly. The fact that Donald Trump has any pull at all with any politics is a travesty. Im glad Huntsman turned it down, hopefully others follow. It can be tricky because you don't want to miss out on getting on tv but this is pretty sad.
Dec 2, 2011 5:51pm
Tobias Fünke's avatar

Tobias Fünke

formerly "sjmvsfscs08"

2,387 posts
Dec 2, 2011 9:10 PM
QuakerOats;996652 wrote:Nice cut and paste job ......... almost laughable.

Get in the game.
Que?
Dec 2, 2011 9:10pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Dec 2, 2011 9:40 PM
The article as a whole is pretty balanced, but there is one quote that is completely over-the-top:
"Among longtime observers of Iowa politics, there remains considerable concern, privately expressed, that Paul might actually win the caucuses -- a result that could make the state irrelevant in future cycles."
If Paul wins Iowa, apparently it doesn't mean that people are behind his message, but rather that the entire state is irrelevant.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57335591-503544/in-iowa-the-ron-paul-factor-could-loom-large/

Copy pasta from Reddit
Dec 2, 2011 9:40pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Dec 3, 2011 12:23 AM
I Wear Pants;998546 wrote:If Paul wins Iowa, apparently it doesn't mean that people are behind his message, but rather that the entire state is irrelevant.
Well, it IS flyover land.
Dec 3, 2011 12:23am
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Dec 3, 2011 2:28 PM
Herman Cain is out of the race. Hopefully after iowa and new hampshire , santorum, bachman and huntsman will all go too.
Dec 3, 2011 2:28pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Dec 3, 2011 2:30 PM
I wonder how many of Cain's votes will go to Paul. Although I have to admit, Paul might be a tough sell in the general election. Between his ideas being painted as crushing the poor (which they will), the lack of "presidential look" does influence a lot of ignorant voters.
Dec 3, 2011 2:30pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Dec 3, 2011 2:54 PM
This can only be good news for Ron Paul. He'll get some more TV time during the debates at least.
Dec 3, 2011 2:54pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Dec 4, 2011 3:54 PM
Who is Vera Baker?
Shouldn't the media look this idividuial up?
Dec 4, 2011 3:54pm
2kool4skool's avatar

2kool4skool

Senior Member

1,804 posts
Dec 4, 2011 6:00 PM
Cain officially dropped out(not that he ever had a chance of winning anyway.) Newt's 15 minutes as the "frontrunner" will soon end, and then Republicans can start coming closer and closer to admitting the inevitable: Mitt Romney will be their nominee.
Dec 4, 2011 6:00pm
Spread All Day's avatar

Spread All Day

Welcome to the Jungle

985 posts
Dec 4, 2011 7:52 PM
I know i'm late, but Ron Paul is the only logical choice for the GOP nod.
Dec 4, 2011 7:52pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Dec 4, 2011 8:18 PM
Spread All Day;1001680 wrote:I know i'm late, but Ron Paul is the only logical choice for the GOP nod.
Yep. Don't seeing it happening though.
Dec 4, 2011 8:18pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Dec 4, 2011 10:58 PM
Our system doesn't work if Paul isn't the nominee.
Dec 4, 2011 10:58pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Dec 4, 2011 11:25 PM
I Wear Pants;1002206 wrote:Our system doesn't work if Paul isn't the nominee.
I think the system sucks balls and will be the downfall of this country.

Hope this helps.
Dec 4, 2011 11:25pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Dec 4, 2011 11:37 PM
WebFire;1002253 wrote:I think the system sucks balls and will be the downfall of this country.

Hope this helps.
That's what I was getting at. If we're going to have a two party system we need to be able to choose from at least somewhat competent choices. Captain "I Campaign on a platform that a lot of people like and make a bunch of promises about transparency, ending ridiculous wars, and protecting freedoms but really I'm GWB in a black guy suit" and whatever schmuck the GOP is probably going to nominate don't count as "competent".
Dec 4, 2011 11:37pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Dec 5, 2011 12:25 AM
I Wear Pants;1002280 wrote:That's what I was getting at. If we're going to have a two party system we need to be able to choose from at least somewhat competent choices. Captain "I Campaign on a platform that a lot of people like and make a bunch of promises about transparency, ending ridiculous wars, and protecting freedoms but really I'm GWB in a black guy suit" and whatever schmuck the GOP is probably going to nominate don't count as "competent".
They don't even count as two parties, since they both do pretty much the same damn thing (though they'll tell you they're drastically different).
Dec 5, 2011 12:25am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Dec 5, 2011 5:28 AM
gut;999081 wrote:I wonder how many of Cain's votes will go to Paul. Although I have to admit, Paul might be a tough sell in the general election. Between his ideas being painted as crushing the poor (which they will), the lack of "presidential look" does influence a lot of ignorant voters.
Ever since the televised Nixon-Kennedy debate, sex appeal has become far more important to the American voter: Style over Substance. Lincoln would never have been elected if Hollyweird and television had been invented in the mid-1800's.

After the MSM tears into Paul, rest assured that either Newt or Romney will get the Repub nomination and then the MSM will once again go to bat for their Appointed One.

It's no longer about what's best for the country. It's about what sells.
Dec 5, 2011 5:28am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Dec 5, 2011 4:37 PM
believer;1002414 wrote:Ever since the televised Nixon-Kennedy debate, sex appeal has become far more important to the American voter: Style over Substance. Lincoln would never have been elected if Hollyweird and television had been invented in the mid-1800's.


It's no longer about what's best for the country. It's about what sells.
Please explain Nixon :)
Dec 5, 2011 4:37pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Dec 5, 2011 5:29 PM
believer;1002414 wrote:Ever since the televised Nixon-Kennedy debate, sex appeal has become far more important to the American voter: Style over Substance. Lincoln would never have been elected if Hollyweird and television had been invented in the mid-1800's.

After the MSM tears into Paul, rest assured that either Newt or Romney will get the Repub nomination and then the MSM will once again go to bat for their Appointed One.

It's no longer about what's best for the country. It's about what sells.
Sex sells...not just for the POTUS position. I blame this phenomenon on women. We men can see through the BS.
Dec 5, 2011 5:29pm
jhay78's avatar

jhay78

Senior Member

1,917 posts
Dec 5, 2011 6:16 PM
Footwedge;1003296 wrote:Sex sells...not just for the POTUS position. I blame this phenomenon on women. We men can see through the BS.
Time to repeal the 19th Amendment!! :D
Dec 5, 2011 6:16pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Dec 5, 2011 6:34 PM
Devils Advocate;1003234 wrote:Please explain Nixon :)
Vietnam and - well -Hubert H. Humphrey. Just sayin'.........;)
Dec 5, 2011 6:34pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Dec 7, 2011 11:29 PM
If you don't think the war on drugs isn't working you should be committed. It's a god damned fact.
Dec 7, 2011 11:29pm
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Dec 7, 2011 11:40 PM
I Wear Pants;1006737 wrote:If you don't think the war on drugs isn't working you should be committed. It's a god damned fact.
And the war on poverty, crime, illiteracy, and whatever the hell other domestic issue the feds want to make war on.
Dec 7, 2011 11:40pm