-Society-
Posts: 1,348
Mar 17, 2011 8:56pm
Thoughts?
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Mar 17, 2011 8:58pm
State wins by 5-10 and Draymond Green has a huge game.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:00pm
The bore fest of the Tournament.
Someone has to win, I'll say MSU by 6.
Someone has to win, I'll say MSU by 6.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:03pm
Azubuike24;715824 wrote:The bore fest of the Tournament.
Someone has to win, I'll say MSU by 6.
Damn those big ten teams and their slow play :rolleyes:
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:04pm
Nah, MSU is tolerable. UCLA and Ben Howland...as boring as all get out.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:11pm
Havent really seen em this year, back when they had Collison and Westbrook it wasnt too bad....is this years team that slow?
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:17pm
UCLA's shoes are horrendous
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 17, 2011 9:18pm
underway
7-0 UCLA
7-0 UCLA
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:19pm
I thought those teams, even when super-talented, they were boring. I remember arguing with CBF on here saying UCLA would NEVER have a chance to cut down the nets with this style.
138th in the nation in scoring, 70 PPG. Definitely in the bottom third of teams in the NCAA Tournament. However, of the 19 NCAA teams below them, Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan and Michigan State are definitely more of a product of the conference style.
I guess we'll see. UCLA has no Seniors, they have the Wear twins coming in next year. The style still won't excite me though.
138th in the nation in scoring, 70 PPG. Definitely in the bottom third of teams in the NCAA Tournament. However, of the 19 NCAA teams below them, Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan and Michigan State are definitely more of a product of the conference style.
I guess we'll see. UCLA has no Seniors, they have the Wear twins coming in next year. The style still won't excite me though.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 17, 2011 9:20pm
quick break for the big guy only two minutes in
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:20pm
Kebler shoudl not be starting for a tournament team lol. Bum
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:24pm
MSU may not score 40...horrible thus far.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 17, 2011 9:25pm
bumbling display of hoops through four minutes
-Society-
Posts: 1,348
Mar 17, 2011 9:29pm
Azubuike24;715857 wrote:MSU may not score 40...horrible thus far.
Really?
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 17, 2011 9:30pm
I wonder why they took Smith out after two minutes
must not have much stamina but it looked like he could clear his way in the post
must not have much stamina but it looked like he could clear his way in the post
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Mar 17, 2011 9:31pm
Non;715859 wrote:bumbling display of hoops through four minutes
Even Hagler Hearns had bad moments.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:33pm
-Society-;715870 wrote:Really?
Sarcastic, but the thought did cross my mind. Like I said in the third post of the thread...this game IS going to be painful to watch.
So is Texas A&M/Florida State tomorrow.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 17, 2011 9:34pm
Lucas better take better shots/better care of the ball if they have any chance
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:35pm
Lucas looks lost
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:36pm
Get Keebler and Thorton out of the game....they dont even want the ball
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 17, 2011 9:37pm
Where is the execution we are accustomed to seeing from an Izzo team, the domination on the glass, I don't get it.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 17, 2011 9:42pm
Great up and under by Roe, a few more Ohio boys and MSU will be fine 
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Mar 17, 2011 9:46pm
Probably game over for MSU unless Lucas picks it up
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 17, 2011 9:47pm
Michigan State looks like the worst team in the Tournament thus far.
The under 40 points might be a reality...
The under 40 points might be a reality...
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 17, 2011 9:48pm
Hb31187;715902 wrote:Probably game over for MSU unless Lucas picks it up
Was just about to say that, they look uninspired