hoops23;806788 wrote:Huh? He went 5/6 from 3 against Duke in the sweet 16 and was 11/17 overall in that game. Just stop.
jordo212000;806790 wrote:That was an aberration IMO. He shot 4 total in the previous two tourney games and then made 1 out of 6 in the last game. Shooting 3s isn't his game.
.jpg)
sleeper;806839 wrote:He shot 56.8% from the 3 during the season. LOL
Admit you're wrong.
We'll see if that part of his game translates to the NBA. I already admitted that I only watched him in the tourney and wasn't overly impressed with his range.He shot 56.8% from the 3 during the season. LOL
Admit you're wrong.
Jordo doesnt like the facts to get in the way of his arguments.
jordo212000;806843 wrote:We'll see if that part of his game translates to the NBA. I already admitted that I only watched him in the tourney and wasn't overly impressed with his range.
Take away the game I'm claiming is an abberation and tell me what his percentage wasWe'll see if that part of his game translates to the NBA. I already admitted that I only watched him in the tourney and wasn't overly impressed with his range.
So he shot 43.8% in his 4 tournaments games from the 3. If that's an aberration worthy of claiming him a poor outside shooter, then you don't know shit about basketball.
Admit you're wrong.
jordo212000;806856 wrote:Take away the game I'm claiming is an abberation and tell me what his percentage was
I didn't say he sucked, just didn't think he was as good a shooter as he is made out to be. I want to see what happens when he has a taller defender on him. Can he take him off the dribble and hit a jumper? Didn't see him do that much. What about his post game? Can he back down taller defenders?Take away the game I'm claiming is an abberation and tell me what his percentage was
So you can pick one game out of a season of 30+ and claim all other games were an aberration? Do you know what the definition of an aberration is?
You've been ruined, just admit you're wrong and we can move on.
jordo212000;806876 wrote:I didn't say he sucked, just didn't think he was as good a shooter as he is made out to be. I want to see what happens when he has a taller defender on him. Can he take him off the dribble and hit a jumper? Didn't see him do that much. What about his post game? Can he back down taller defenders?
Why should I admit I am wrong? I think he is a great player, just have some questions. I have said earlier thread I thought he was a clear number 2. His height and ability to shoot contested shots against taller players is my main problem with him. Especially when his post moves consist of dunking on overwhelmed PAC 10 competitionI didn't say he sucked, just didn't think he was as good a shooter as he is made out to be. I want to see what happens when he has a taller defender on him. Can he take him off the dribble and hit a jumper? Didn't see him do that much. What about his post game? Can he back down taller defenders?
If 56.8% from the 3 and 59.5% from the field isn't as "good a shooter as he is made out to be", I'd like you to identify who you consider a good shooter.
This should be hilarious, just admit you're wrong, this is embarrassing.
sleeper;806851 wrote:So he shot 43.8% in his 4 tournaments games from the 3. If that's an aberration worthy of claiming him a poor outside shooter, then you don't know shit about basketball.
Admit you're wrong.
Who am I trolling?So he shot 43.8% in his 4 tournaments games from the 3. If that's an aberration worthy of claiming him a poor outside shooter, then you don't know shit about basketball.
Admit you're wrong.
LMAO, havent see a beat down this bad in a while. Typical BS from Jordo, he's either a troll, and idiot, or more likely, a trolling idiot.
jordo212000;806905 wrote:Who am I trolling?
Sleeper, since when does expressing doubt about whether an undersized 4 can shoot over taller players and shoot off the dribble equal calling him a "bad" shooter? He is the consensus number 2 guy. My original point was that Irving was a much safer pick
