Archive Battlefield 3 - Ohio Chatter

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Mar 2, 2011 9:41pm

Discuss how awesome it's going to be.

[video=youtube;SFq06eoCmbQ][/video]

Hb31187

Posts: 8,534

Mar 2, 2011 9:48pm

If its anything like 2....it will suck

edit, confused it with Battlefield :Bad company 2

imex99

Posts: 4,927

Mar 2, 2011 9:56pm

looks really good

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Mar 2, 2011 9:56pm

You were confused.

But you were also wrong. BF:BC2 is a very solid game.

Hb31187

Posts: 8,534

Mar 2, 2011 10:07pm

Eh, disagree. I returned it within a week....and i rarely do that with games

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Mar 2, 2011 10:10pm

What didn't you like about it?

bases_loaded

Posts: 6,912

Mar 2, 2011 10:22pm

I Wear Pants;697994 wrote:You were confused.

But you were also wrong. BF:BC2 is a very solid game.

THIS

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Mar 3, 2011 1:56am

I Wear Pants;698004 wrote:What didn't you like about it?

I'm guessing because it was actually team based and not a run and spray game.

I usually get both Battlefield and COD, because they offer a completely different play style... When I want to pick up and shoot anything in sight, I'll play COD.. When I want to have some strategy/team work involved, I played BF...

Part of the reason I loved MAG as much as I did was the team based goals.

Now, if you want to talk horrible games.. World at War and MW2 classify as such. I returned both games within a 14 day period. I'm enjoying Black Ops as much as I did COD4.

TedSheckler

Posts: 3,974

Mar 3, 2011 5:45am

As a PC gamer, I am so excited for BF3. DICE is designing this game around the PC and not just making a console port like most games have been since BF2. BF2 was an amazing game and BF3 shouldn't disappoint.

Hb31187

Posts: 8,534

Mar 3, 2011 4:13pm

I Wear Pants;697994 wrote:You were confused.

But you were also wrong. BF:BC2 is a very solid game.

Honestly dont remember, played it only a handful of times like a full year ago

imex99

Posts: 4,927

Apr 18, 2011 2:00pm

12 minutes of game play

[video=dailymotion;xi9cyo][/video]

Heretic

Posts: 18,820

Apr 18, 2011 2:04pm

Saw the commercials for it last night. If it plays remotely as well as it looks, it'll be great.

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Apr 18, 2011 2:05pm

This game is going to blow the COD games up to this point away!

BF2 was a great game, but this looks to be on an entirely different level.

j_crazy

Posts: 8,372

Apr 18, 2011 2:06pm

I'm excited about this game.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Apr 18, 2011 2:17pm

[video=youtube;2x-kZma5n94][/video]
Better quality video. Watch it in HD for the pretties.

M

MontyBrunswick

Apr 18, 2011 3:47pm

64-player battles on the PC will be awesome.

However, I echo what someone else said about BC2. I heard nothing but praise about it so I bought it recently and wasn't impressed. It's OK...but I still prefer Team Fortress 2.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Apr 18, 2011 4:35pm

Why were you comparing TF2 to BF:BC2?

M

MontyBrunswick

Apr 18, 2011 5:54pm

I Wear Pants;744003 wrote:Why were you comparing TF2 to BF:BC2?

They're both "team" based first-person shooters. But yeah, I can see why it's a bad comparison. I don't know. BC2 just felt slow.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Apr 18, 2011 6:03pm

It's supposed to be. Real battles of the scale they're trying to pull off don't end in 4 minutes.

I can see how that would be jarring if you don't expect that going in but I suggest anyone take a little bit longer look at the game as it's got a lot of depth and refinement to it IMO.

But yeah, I love TF2 (please for the love of Christ tell me you aren't playing it on a console).

M

MontyBrunswick

Apr 18, 2011 8:47pm

I Wear Pants;744057 wrote:It's supposed to be. Real battles of the scale they're trying to pull off don't end in 4 minutes.

I can see how that would be jarring if you don't expect that going in but I suggest anyone take a little bit longer look at the game as it's got a lot of depth and refinement to it IMO.

But yeah, I love TF2 (please for the love of Christ tell me you aren't playing it on a console).

Hells no. You can add me on Steam if you want, my username here is the same on Steam.

F

Fabio

Posts: 547

Apr 18, 2011 9:26pm

Saw the trailer last night, my dad didn't catch the "first person" bits, and he thought it was a movie and wanted to go see it! The graphics are sick.

T

tuskytuffguy

Posts: 615

Apr 18, 2011 11:11pm

Keep in mind, the graphics always look better in trailers than when actually played. I hated BC2 because the graphics compared to COD were shit, but I'm hoping that somehow, someway, this game lives up to the trailer, because I'm tired of playing just one franchise(COD). I like some variety!

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Apr 18, 2011 11:13pm

tuskytuffguy;744484 wrote:Keep in mind, the graphics always look better in trailers than when actually played. I hated BC2 because the graphics compared to COD were shit, but I'm hoping that somehow, someway, this game lives up to the trailer, because I'm tired of playing just one franchise(COD). I like some variety!

The trailer was used with all in-game footage.

B

bigkahuna

Posts: 4,454

Apr 18, 2011 11:25pm

I was never into first person shooter games, but I started getting into the last 2 COD Games MW2 BOps. This game has now caught my eye.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Apr 19, 2011 1:09am

tuskytuffguy;744484 wrote:Keep in mind, the graphics always look better in trailers than when actually played. I hated BC2 because the graphics compared to COD were shit, but I'm hoping that somehow, someway, this game lives up to the trailer, because I'm tired of playing just one franchise(COD). I like some variety!

You're blind if you thought COD had better visuals. Especially considering that COD is really quite linear without any real interaction with the environment. And this was gameplay as hoops said.