I happened to catch this "Brow beating " last night. All I can say is Lawrence O'Donnell is everything that is bad about political commentators.He won't let Rep. Chaffetz answer questions and when Chaffetz tries to answer in context, O'Donnell puts words in his mouth. He then calls him a tax cheat for living in his office, just like many other elected officials who work in Washington.

Check out his work.

http://www.utahpolicy.com/featured_article/msnbcs-lawrence-odonnell-accuses-jason-chaffetz-tax-evasion-sleeping-his-office

Lawrence O'Donnell is a asshole just like all of MSNBC Network Reporters

O'Donnell is a fine example of DNA wastage.

Well let's see, this would be the same network that hired Olbermann, right?

There's your answer, fishbulb.

Interesting interview. How much you want to bet one of the Congressman's staffers was checking up on that today?

As for O'Donnell's style, I didn't think it was any different than what I usually see from O'Reilly or Hannity. They are the pros when it comes to talking over someone they disagree with.

Anyone that has watched any of these announcers would quickly realize there is a major difference between all three (I will make it four as I will throw in Glenn Beck). Other than the fact they are employed at Fox, there are even major differences between Bill O., Hannity and Beck. The three are not one and the same. O'Reilly is much more liberal than the other two and often goes out of his way to heap praise to Obama. Hannity is probably the most partisan of the Fox trio. As CC noted above, when was the last time O'Donnell had a conservative on their air? O'Reilly has them on every night.

ccrunner609;682378 wrote:Oh please, O'Reilly might lean a little to the right but he is very fair and has far left people on every night.

Oh, please, I'm surprised you didn't use the term "fair and balanced" to describe Bill. I will agree that he has Colmes on quite a bit, but Bill usually shouts him down when he doesn't agree with his point of view. I must admit, Bill is at his best when he has women on his show. Condescending would be a mild term to describe his act.


And you'll notice I used the word "act". We must all remember that neither O'Reilly, Maddow, O'Donnell, Hannity, Beck or Olbermann have any journalistic credentials whatsoever. They are entertainers. Their job is to be outrageous and garner the most viewers in their respective time slots. None of them, I repeat, none of them can make any claim at all of being journalists.

Nobody is disagreeing with you -- especially those of us who have actually worked as a journalist.

I agree with Joe Scarborough.


“Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough, a four-term member of Congress, rejected that the practice is illicit, calling it “a made-up controversy.”

“It’s such a made-up controversy,” Scarborough said. “You know just like Paul(Ryan), my first year up there I got a place in northern Virginia and my family was back in the district. And I realized, I started work at 7:00, stopped working at 11:00 at night and then I would drive home to sleep in Virginia for like three or four hours. So I was like, I might as well just stay here and I actually, I know it sounds like, crazy, but I actually got even more work done, because I’d wake up at 5:30. And the computer was there, I would start working. I mean, Paul, I swear I was 50 percent more effective being — you just live your work. And since your family’s at home, that allows you when you get home to be with them more. “

Prescott;682456 wrote:I agree with Joe Scarborough.


“Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough, a four-term member of Congress, rejected that the practice is illicit, calling it “a made-up controversy.”

Yep, and guess what folks, Joe is on MSNBC.
He is really the only reason I watch that awful channel. Joe is truly a breath of fresh air.

I caught O'Donnell's show last night and I was surprised to see Ann Coulter on. They had a rather nice conversation about Chris Christie (her man for 2012) and it didn't degenerate into name-calling or nastiness. One of the few times I've been able to watch her for the entire interview.

And ptown is right about Scarborough. He is one of the best political voices on cable because he tells it like it is, regardless of party or dogma.

stlouiedipalma;682384 wrote:Oh, please, I'm surprised you didn't use the term "fair and balanced" to describe Bill. I will agree that he has Colmes on quite a bit, but Bill usually shouts him down when he doesn't agree with his point of view. I must admit, Bill is at his best when he has women on his show. Condescending would be a mild term to describe his act.


And you'll notice I used the word "act". We must all remember that neither O'Reilly, Maddow, O'Donnell, Hannity, Beck or Olbermann have any journalistic credentials whatsoever. They are entertainers. Their job is to be outrageous and garner the most viewers in their respective time slots. None of them, I repeat, none of them can make any claim at all of being journalists.

Can't agree more.

Although O'Reilly has calmed down a bit since Beck came to prominence. Probably because he didn't want to be associated with that sort of bat-shit insane conservatism. (Not implying being conservative is inherently insane, just Beck).


CC, who is that?

Pants it's Geithner.

That's right. He had a little "tax form" trouble revelation just after he was nominated as Sec. of Treasury, didn't he?

That's right. He had a little "tax form" trouble revelation just after he was nominated as Sec. of Treasury, didn't he?

Actually, he neglected to pay his social security taxes in numerous years.

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2009/01/editorial_geithner_tax_problem.html

Prescott;685456 wrote:Actually, he neglected to pay his social security taxes in numerous years.

He's just doing his part to save SS.