Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Dec 3, 2009 4:05pm
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Job-Summit-Ignores-Job-ibd-1873256912.html?x=0
Incredible! Then again, nothing this group of radicals does is surprising anymore.
Change we can believe in ........................
Incredible! Then again, nothing this group of radicals does is surprising anymore.
Change we can believe in ........................
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 3, 2009 4:11pm
First of all, it's a joke that the NFIB and Chamber weren't invited to this--yet he says that small business is well represented.
But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring." That they should be more worried about hiring people than their profits...
Clearly as the head of what is basically the only "business" that doesn't have to turn a profit to stay afloat, he clearly doesn't understand how important your profits are. But I honestly can't believe I heard that today. I'm baffled. This guy is dumber than I ever could have thought. Want them to hire more people--maybe you ought to cut their taxes so they can make a profit AND hire new employees...hmm, maybe that makes too much sense to him. But does he not realize that in saying that, if everyone were to go along with it, not only would it kill the economy and MANY businesses in the long run--but if they're not making money then the government is going to lose A LOT of tax revenue. What a MORON!
But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring." That they should be more worried about hiring people than their profits...
Clearly as the head of what is basically the only "business" that doesn't have to turn a profit to stay afloat, he clearly doesn't understand how important your profits are. But I honestly can't believe I heard that today. I'm baffled. This guy is dumber than I ever could have thought. Want them to hire more people--maybe you ought to cut their taxes so they can make a profit AND hire new employees...hmm, maybe that makes too much sense to him. But does he not realize that in saying that, if everyone were to go along with it, not only would it kill the economy and MANY businesses in the long run--but if they're not making money then the government is going to lose A LOT of tax revenue. What a MORON!
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Dec 3, 2009 4:25pm
Why don't you just put the "Change we can believe in" in your signature?
Would save you a little bit of typing on every single post you make.
Would save you a little bit of typing on every single post you make.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c5b/f5c5bfcdad4e55eba7203dbf19485276cfd5a84a" alt="CenterBHSFan's avatar"
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Dec 3, 2009 4:33pm
Change we can believe in!!!!!1111!!!!!!!1!!!
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Dec 3, 2009 4:40pm
Having to type it is a constant reminder of how damaging his/their change is, and that they must be soundly defeated in their next election bids. Thanks anyhow.cbus4life wrote: Why don't you just put the "Change we can believe in" in your signature?
Would save you a little bit of typing on every single post you make.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Dec 3, 2009 4:42pm
SQ Crazies --- he is not stupid; he purposefully has surrounded himself with socialists and Marxists who have no concept of what it takes to run a business; their cause is to dismantle capitalism and free markets............ they are well on their way.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Dec 3, 2009 5:02pm
Who is the author of this piece of shit? Whoever he/she is has very few facts straight in his/her essay. Very few.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Dec 3, 2009 5:11pm
I read the article twice...and I don't see any quotes along these lines attributed to anyone.SQ_Crazies wrote: But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring."
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Dec 3, 2009 5:43pm
Authored by Investors Business Daily -- IBD. Perhaps among the most repsected publications in the business world; sorry you don't approve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 3, 2009 6:13pm
Ok, I heard the words come straight from Obama's mouth over the radio.Footwedge wrote:I read the article twice...and I don't see any quotes along these lines attributed to anyone.SQ_Crazies wrote: But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring."
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Dec 3, 2009 6:43pm
For the last time, he has not surrounded himself with freaking MARXISTS!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 3, 2009 6:53pm
Howard Dean seems to think capitalism is dead...so I'd say he thinks otherwise.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Dec 3, 2009 7:01pm
Foot this link is especially for you. If you want to hear it in Obama's words instead of reading the transcript you can join Rush 24/7.Footwedge wrote:I read the article twice...and I don't see any quotes along these lines attributed to anyone.SQ_Crazies wrote: But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring."
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120309/content/01125111.guest.html
Below is the full transcript from the White House reguarding what crazies heard on the radio.
I think this is the part in question from the presidents introductary words.
But despite the progress we've made, many businesses are still skittish about hiring. Some are still digging themselves out of the losses they incurred over the past year. Many have figured out how to squeeze more productivity out of fewer workers, and that cost-cutting has become embedded in their operations and in their culture. That may result in good profits, but it's not translating into hiring. And so that's the question that we have to ask ourselves today: How do we get businesses to start hiring again? How do we get ourselves to the point where more people are working, and more people are spending, and you start seeing a virtuous cycle and the recovery starts to feed on itself?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-and-vice-president-opening-session-jobs-and-economic-growth-forum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Dec 3, 2009 7:09pm
Dude...if Wedge clicks on rushlimbaugh.com, his freaking head will split apart!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 3, 2009 7:15pm
Yeah, wouldn't want him to explore a different source of media--someone who is actually smart and not tied down by people more powerful than he is, someone who is strong in his beliefs and MAKES SENSE and slams BOTH sides when need be. Wouldn't hate to see someone explore that source because CNN tells you not to! Why do you think they tell you not to? Why do you think they label him as a nut job? Same reason they label Ron Paul a nut job and the same reason they embraced John McCain for the most part--if its someone they're scared of because they're smart and they make sense, they label them nuts and people buy it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 3, 2009 7:17pm
20 million listeners...I laugh at people that swear him off and say he's an idiot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff0cc/ff0ccd8264fd4f388dbd3a0b305d0c2a4c615ddf" alt="Mr. 300's avatar"
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 3, 2009 9:50pm
When you hear Obama say what he said today, you just cringe at the fact this country elected a total neophyte as leader of the free world. He doesn't have a clue of what to do in order to create jobs. 38% of the stimulus has been spent, and what do we have???? No jobs created.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Dec 4, 2009 12:01am
Businesses hire people when they expand. Cost cutting is keeping these businesses afloat, but they have no reason to think they will be expanding anytime soon, especially with trillions of dollars of new entitlements on the horizon, which means their taxes will be going up and their expenses (energy, commodities, and imports) will be going up as the dollar plummets. If they get cap-and-tax through there, energy prices will skyrocket. No amount of cost cutting will save them then, and exactly no one will be hiring except the U.S. government.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 4, 2009 2:18am
Cap and tax is done at this point IMO--thank God. But you're right, there is no incentive for a business to attempt to expand right now. Cut their taxes and maybe there will be, but right now there are VERY few business owners in a position to expand. But hey, maybe they should then they'd all be too big to fail right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c5b/f5c5bfcdad4e55eba7203dbf19485276cfd5a84a" alt="CenterBHSFan's avatar"
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Dec 4, 2009 9:43am
Crazies,
You don't think that after this massive social program (government insurance) that they will turn to getting CnT rammed through?
You don't think that after this massive social program (government insurance) that they will turn to getting CnT rammed through?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31a/7c31a46af98d5764bc2053a6a365e2674a9a9cf7" alt="derek bomar's avatar"
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Dec 4, 2009 9:46am
I find nothing wrong with what he said, but then again, I'm a commie leftistmajorspark wrote:Foot this link is especially for you. If you want to hear it in Obama's words instead of reading the transcript you can join Rush 24/7.Footwedge wrote:I read the article twice...and I don't see any quotes along these lines attributed to anyone.SQ_Crazies wrote: But did I honestly hear him correctly when he basically blamed unemployment on small business because "they've learned to be more productive with fewer employees, which is good for profits but not good for hiring."
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120309/content/01125111.guest.html
Below is the full transcript from the White House reguarding what crazies heard on the radio.
I think this is the part in question from the presidents introductary words.But despite the progress we've made, many businesses are still skittish about hiring. Some are still digging themselves out of the losses they incurred over the past year. Many have figured out how to squeeze more productivity out of fewer workers, and that cost-cutting has become embedded in their operations and in their culture. That may result in good profits, but it's not translating into hiring. And so that's the question that we have to ask ourselves today: How do we get businesses to start hiring again? How do we get ourselves to the point where more people are working, and more people are spending, and you start seeing a virtuous cycle and the recovery starts to feed on itself?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-and-vice-president-opening-session-jobs-and-economic-growth-forum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c5b/f5c5bfcdad4e55eba7203dbf19485276cfd5a84a" alt="CenterBHSFan's avatar"
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Dec 4, 2009 9:50am
DB, Are you talking about President Obama or Rush Limbaugh? (you found nothing wrong with what he said?)
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Dec 4, 2009 12:06pm
Cap N' Trade is dead in the water.You don't think that after this massive social program (government insurance) that they will turn to getting CnT rammed through?
Like many things, it will make it through the house but never see the light of day in the Senate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7240b/7240b69f5e5a47f92a039ba9e2bc318c752425be" alt="SQ_Crazies's avatar"
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Dec 4, 2009 1:35pm
I think they could. But I'm more optimistic than that--at least I'm trying to force optimism. But I really think Climategate is going to kill it. I'm not sure it's legs were ever long enough to get it run though anyways.CenterBHSFan wrote: Crazies,
You don't think that after this massive social program (government insurance) that they will turn to getting CnT rammed through?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Dec 4, 2009 5:45pm
I would happily debate the fat fuck on the AM dial regarding economics. Since I have a degree in business and minor in economics. I would crush the college drop out....with my left nut tied behind my back. And I don't need God's talent lent to me either to do so.SQ_Crazies wrote: Yeah, wouldn't want him to explore a different source of media--someone who is actually smart and not tied down by people more powerful than he is, someone who is strong in his beliefs and MAKES SENSE and slams BOTH sides when need be. Wouldn't hate to see someone explore that source because CNN tells you not to! Why do you think they tell you not to? Why do you think they label him as a nut job? Same reason they label Ron Paul a nut job and the same reason they embraced John McCain for the most part--if its someone they're scared of because they're smart and they make sense, they label them nuts and people buy it.
A typical phooie quote from the pseudo conservative MuhahahahRushie..
"the national debt is no big deal".