Dream team lawyer said he had additional evidence which would have proven the Juice's innocence. Says Ron Goldman and OJ's ex-wife killed over owed drug money.


http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oGdVuSCy1NQl0BJIhXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEwOWdiMGxhBHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA01TWUMwMDFfMTg3/SIG=127jra492/EXP=1294884114/**http%3a//www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/49104/

Just read that article a few minutes ago. IMO, Bailey has little credibility.

"I'm not saying he killed her, but I understand"

Weird...I just read two books related to this case. There is no doubt the police and prosecution made some major mistakes but I still believe he killed them and my opinion won't change.

I read the OJ book "If I Did It" wasn't bad except for the killing part where he comes up with some "alter ego or imaginary friend" named Charlie and blacks out!!!

Fucktard Lee Bailey is a joke. Hope OJ has been a good little "wife" while in prison.

Y eah, so facing life in prison, you held back proof of his innocence? Then, in a civil trial - one he lost costing him pretty much everything but his pension - you still held back? OJ should get a refund from Bailey.

"I have proof of his innocence, but I'd prefer to convince you without it"....Nice work, Perry Mason

wasn't the book called "If I Did It?"

darbypitcher22;634990 wrote:wasn't the book called "If I Did It?"

That is what I said, however Goldman Sr. got the rights to it and changed it to "I Did It"

I read "If I Did It" and there was one thing in particular that stuck out to me. He said that on the night in question Nicole came after him kicking and flailing her arms and he said he threw her down and she hit her head on the ground and/or step and was either unconscious or completely out of it while he killed Ronald Goldman. I was then reading Robert Shapiro's book a day later and he was criticizing the coroner for missing a bruise on her brain and I thought...well that makes perfect sense if it happened the way he described it. I definitely do not buy the whole accomplice "Charlie" thing at all but I believe most of the events he wrote about happened as he said they did. Originally people thought Nicole must have been killed first because there was no blood on the bottom of her feet but if she was just laying here unable to get up that would explain why.

gut;634985 wrote:Y eah, so facing life in prison, you held back proof of his innocence? Then, in a civil trial - one he lost costing him pretty much everything but his pension - you still held back? OJ should get a refund from Bailey.

"I have proof of his innocence, but I'd prefer to convince you without it"....Nice work, Perry Mason

Meh, it wasn't as if Bailey "held back". The Court likely excluded some evidence they wanted to present based on a legal objection from the prosecution. In fairness the prosecution likely had evidence they could not introduce based on similar motions in limine filed by the defense.

Has OJ ever gone after the person who "may" have done it? I mean...for me, if someone killed my wife I'd be all over the police trying to find out who did it?

If I was the one that did it...I'd probably lay low...just sayin

raiderbuck;636480 wrote:Has OJ ever gone after the person who "may" have done it? I mean...for me, if someone killed my wife I'd be all over the police trying to find out who did it?

If I was the one that did it...I'd probably lay low...just sayin

He vowed he would find the "real Killer' but to my knowledge he has never actually persued it. He has also done everything in his power to not pay the Brown and Goldman families which is how the Goldmans ended up with the rights to his book "If I did It".

OJ did it.

...It doesn't matter what F.Lee says, Johnny Cochran had it all under control with the gloves didn't fit so they had to acquit!

OJ is innocent.

Some puerto rican dude did it.

Same one who killed Jonetbonet.

It was all hashed out, and solved, on south park

raiderbuck;636480 wrote:Has OJ ever gone after the person who "may" have done it? I mean...for me, if someone killed my wife I'd be all over the police trying to find out who did it?

If I was the one that did it...I'd probably lay low...just sayin

With double jeapordy laws, you could come out and say you did it and not get convicted. So, in essence O.J. doesn't have to lay low if he doesn't want to.

Scarlet_Buckeye;636930 wrote:OJ did it.

You could have presented this as your only argument in the trial and it would have been better than what the prosecution presented.