H
HeathAlum21
Posts: 363
Jan 7, 2011 6:22pm
I know there are several Big 10 games before then, which are always big, but take a look at this line-up. With all the talk of OSU's easy schedule, this area should certainly be deadly.
Feb 6- @ Minnesota
Feb 12- @ Wisky
Feb 15- Vs. MSU
Feb 19- @ Purdue
Feb 22- Vs. Illinois
What say you?
Feb 6- @ Minnesota
Feb 12- @ Wisky
Feb 15- Vs. MSU
Feb 19- @ Purdue
Feb 22- Vs. Illinois
What say you?
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Jan 7, 2011 10:33pm
HeathAlum21;629484 wrote:I know there are several Big 10 games before then, which are always big, but take a look at this line-up. With all the talk of OSU's easy schedule, this area should certainly be deadly.
Feb 6- @ Minnesota
Feb 12- @ Wisky
Feb 15- Vs. MSU
Feb 19- @ Purdue
Feb 22- Vs. Illinois
What say you?
Possible loss at Purdue or Wisky. I say 4-1. Worst case, 3-2 IMO.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22da3/22da30da97fcee0f887129ba6b5efa1ed8ed91b9" alt="Jester's avatar"
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 7, 2011 10:48pm
5-0 at best, 0-5 at worst.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c79ee/c79ee8aa7b8b3d8c4a55216ad1026ae6a7ec3256" alt="Writerbuckeye's avatar"
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Jan 9, 2011 6:52pm
Jester;629648 wrote:5-0 at best, 0-5 at worst.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f89bb/f89bb99d9f133386c9a7a28d597a62d78e5deb8a" alt=""
H
holdingout
Posts: 585
Jan 15, 2011 6:33am
Jester;629648 wrote:5-0 at best, 0-5 at worst.
Einstein.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22da3/22da30da97fcee0f887129ba6b5efa1ed8ed91b9" alt="Jester's avatar"
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 15, 2011 1:27pm
Eh, I dunno. I'm pretty sure i'm smarter than him.holdingout;638874 wrote:Einstein.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Jan 15, 2011 1:45pm
Ohio State matches up well with just about every team in the Big Ten. My biggest worry is Purdue. So I say at worse 4-1 or 3-2 because Michigan State still has Izzo.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Jan 15, 2011 1:57pm
My biggest concern in facing Purdue is Juan Johnson. At 6'10, he is very athletic, and can score in bunches. He gave us fits last year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22da3/22da30da97fcee0f887129ba6b5efa1ed8ed91b9" alt="Jester's avatar"
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 15, 2011 2:01pm
Dude can score from anywhere. He has the ability to draw either Sully or Lauderdale, whoever guards him, away from the basket, which in turn can open up the lane. If he draws Dallas out, it severely limits his ability to rebound and block shots, which is basically all he does.mallymal614;639113 wrote:My biggest concern in facing Purdue is Juan Johnson. At 6'10, he is very athletic, and can score in bunches. He gave us fits last year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c82f/4c82f388828d7e06ea92094f65fae35c079e28c8" alt="Hb31187's avatar"
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 15, 2011 2:11pm
Yeah, JuJuan Johnson is a deadly big man. His jumper went from non existant fresman year.....to knock down this year and last year
All the while being a great rebounder, and maybe the best shot blocker in the big 10
All the while being a great rebounder, and maybe the best shot blocker in the big 10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22da3/22da30da97fcee0f887129ba6b5efa1ed8ed91b9" alt="Jester's avatar"
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 15, 2011 2:18pm
Even added the ability to shoot the 3 ball, although not at a great percentage.Hb31187;639121 wrote:Yeah, JuJuan Johnson is a deadly big man. His jumper went from non existant fresman year.....to knock down this year and last year
All the while being a great rebounder, and maybe the best shot blocker in the big 10
And i'd guess it's either him or Lauderdale for best shot blocker. Both averaging around the same amount per game, with Lauderdale playing less minutes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c82f/4c82f388828d7e06ea92094f65fae35c079e28c8" alt="Hb31187's avatar"
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 15, 2011 2:49pm
Edit, wrong thread