Another sideline incident in the NFL

Pro Sports 12 replies 610 views
S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
Dec 19, 2010 11:57pm
This is probably worse then the jets one but i do think he acted alone and didnt have it planned out like the jets (forming a wall)

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Video-Another-sideline-tripping-incident-earns-?urn=nfl-297986
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 20, 2010 9:28am
Should be suspended the rest of the season. That is 100% thugism.
Skyhook79's avatar
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 20, 2010 9:55am
Makes what the Jets coach did seem trivial.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Dec 20, 2010 5:01pm
$15,000 for that? Com'on that's worse than a James Harrison shot by far.
Sykotyk's avatar
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Dec 20, 2010 5:21pm
Suspended for the season. Unnecessary interference with the play. Attempt to injure. Disrupt a live game when not being part of the play.

This was heinous.
royal_k's avatar
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Dec 20, 2010 5:35pm
Yeah.....this one is worse, and it's not even close. If the trainer is suspended, how do you not suspend this guy? Total BS
oberhaus's avatar
oberhaus
Posts: 868
Dec 20, 2010 5:35pm
I dont have a problem with forming a wall and not moving. I do have a issue with the tripping on purpose and for sure this action by the Carolina guy. Thats just stupid. But the wall thing by the Jets is ok by me. Gunners should have to stay in bounds. But dont trip the dude on purpose.

Sent from my DROIDX
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 20, 2010 5:36pm
The fine was issued on Friday but was not made public.

It wasn't made public? Are the league offices turning into the Nixon White House? If there was ever any doubt that the league is more interested in the perception of caring about player safety rather than the practice of it, this is it. The NFL made a big to-do about Sal Alosi and issued him a harsh punishment befitting that outrage. Brayton does something that's much worse and much more dirty (he ran over to play and threw an elbow) and the league tries a Friday news dump and issues a nominal fine?

Brayton was forced to pay $15,000 from his $2.2 million salary, while Alosi earned a suspension for the rest of the season and a $25,000 fine. And he makes a normal salary as a strength and conditioning coach, not the millions Brayton does. That's pure and utter hypocrisy. (Throw in the fact that Brayton has a past history of dirty play and it's even worse. In 2006 he was fined $25,000 for kneeing another player in the groin.)
I do find it interesting that the event that happened on national television and had that game's commentators highlighting the Alosi trip and condemning it right when it happened was made into this huge "we can not condone this" deal that got the coach fined and suspended indefinitely...but this instance, which apparently wasn't noticed by the guys doing the game if the story broke just yesterday, gets covered over with a tiny fine and no real action.

The NFL: Where we care about player safety...at least when there are big headlines concerning it.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Dec 20, 2010 5:55pm
Thug!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 10:59pm
So much for the Jets being the dirtiest organization on the planet. Alosi's incident was child's play compared to this and he got penalized HARD in comparison.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 20, 2010 11:38pm
^^
That's why the refs won the game for you. Their way to "behind-the-scenes" make things cool.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:50pm
Heretic;608871 wrote:^^
That's why the refs won the game for you. Their way to "behind-the-scenes" make things cool.

That sounds rights.
Sykotyk's avatar
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Dec 20, 2010 11:52pm
The problem with this is that the players association has a contract with the league. There is no such CBA for trainers and assistants. Hence the much more public and harsh punishment. I think the league has tried to brush this under the rug because they are simply restricted in how severe the punishment can be.