karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 12:49am
Here ya go.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 16, 2010 4:14pm
what did he miss out on?
I see that I missed him (sorry) on the Ravens win....but that was 500 at 2/3 odds?
I see that I missed him (sorry) on the Ravens win....but that was 500 at 2/3 odds?
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Dec 16, 2010 4:18pm
oops, I didn't pay attention to the odds, only that I hadn't been paid. Suggestions?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:19pm
Merry Christmas.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:21pm
Ironman92;603205 wrote:what did he miss out on?
I see that I missed him (sorry) on the Ravens win....but that was 500 at 2/3 odds?
Do you also owe everyone what they originally wagered on the thread that was wrongly settled? Like FatHobbit bet 500 which he lost, so he lost the 500 plus whatever winnings he would have received? Does that make sense?
Edit: You don't owe them, the bank of justin does, but you know what I mean?
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 16, 2010 4:23pm
Was there another one he was shorted on or just the Ravens striaght up win?
He was owed 852 on the Ravens win......MC indeed!
He was owed 852 on the Ravens win......MC indeed!
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:27pm
Just Ravens, the second one in this thread was for him to recoup the 500 he lost when he first wagered it. If the Ravens bet was settled properly, he would have gotten his 500 back plus the winnings. Instead he lost out on the 500 and the winnings. I might have the odds wrong for the first "bet" in this thread but the 1:1 one makes sense right??
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Dec 16, 2010 4:30pm
karen lotz;603226 wrote:Just Ravens, the second one in this thread was for him to recoup the 500 he lost when he first wagered it. If the Ravens bet was settled properly, he would have gotten his 500 back plus the winnings. Instead he lost out on the 500 and the winnings. I might have the odds wrong for the first "bet" in this thread but the 1:1 one makes sense right??
I get what you're saying. I should have won $352 and got the original $500 back, but instead got $455 and the original $500 back.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:34pm
Yeah my bad on the odds on that one. Hard to keep 213 threads straight on here. Like I said, Merry Christmas!!!
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 16, 2010 4:38pm
Well.....lol
If he started with 10,000.....bet 500......that puts him to 9500.....win 500 @ 2/3 and account would be 10,352.
If he started with 10,000.....bet 500...got screwed....account at 9,500......take 500 out at 10/11 and 500 more at 1/1...now down to 8500.....win both and account is now 10,450ish...just a 100...lol Merry Christmas
If he started with 10,000.....bet 500......that puts him to 9500.....win 500 @ 2/3 and account would be 10,352.
If he started with 10,000.....bet 500...got screwed....account at 9,500......take 500 out at 10/11 and 500 more at 1/1...now down to 8500.....win both and account is now 10,450ish...just a 100...lol Merry Christmas
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 16, 2010 4:38pm
so my redemption thread needs the original bet at 1/1 as well to get back all the money....correct?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:42pm
Yes I think so. The 10/11 odds was an error on my part, for whatever reason I thought that's what the odds were on that bet. Pure confusion while trying to make the correction. That one should have been 2/3. The 1/1 odds are just to recoup the original vcash wagered and "lost." Does that make sense??Ironman92;603240 wrote:so my redemption thread needs the original bet at 1/1 as well to get back all the money....correct?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 16, 2010 4:43pm
He got the extra 100ish, chalk it up to interest he could have earned over the time between Monday and today.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 16, 2010 4:44pm
OK....I've fixed mine....now those 10 people need to go bet again before I can correctly settle it.