I'm not positive, but I think I read they they have just a little bit more sodium than the old fries. Other than that I think they are pretty much the same.NWIndianNation01;565225 wrote:I know they have them in the Dover area now...and our local store said they get them next week. One girl in our office said they were amazing...however I read somewhere that they are a lot more fattening...if that is true, then that is an interesting route to take...
Arby's and McDonald's get my vote. I can eat McD's fries hot and fresh or not so much and they are delicious either way. Like gerb said...if you didn't get Wendy's fries when they were hot they sucked.Scarlet_Buckeye;565551 wrote:Nothing beats Rallies fries. Wendy's old ones were probably second. I haven't tried their new ones yet, though.
namod65;595412 wrote:The "Natural Cut" part is just bullshit. They are exactly the same as the old ones except they taste like they have twice the salt.
OneBuckeye;565217 wrote:I liked the old ones. But skin on with sea salt seems to buck the trend of fast food fries. I didn't know they got new ones, have they been advertising?
That's what I said haha. I have to say I prefer the new ones. The old ones were too blandThe "Natural Cut" part is just bullshit. They are exactly the same as the old ones except they taste like they have twice the salt.
You were doing it wrong... you have to dip them in the Frostie!wes_mantooth;595563 wrote:I liked the old ones cuz they were great to dip into their chili.
