
skank
Posts: 6,543
May 11, 2011 8:28pm
rmolin73;765047 wrote:Rocket08 that clown skank makes a fool out of himself on a continual basis. What I posted mentioned nothing about a schedule or what team has played another. Most schools that I mentioned rarely if at al play private schools until the post season. But yet he chooses to to say that I am playing the tough guy role and saying we would play anyone, anytime. When the kids will in fact play whomever is scheduled just like most kids. Its the adults that whine and cry and give their kids an inferiority complex.
Again with the namecalling? Why is it that "you guys" can't make a post without calling someone with a different opinion names? Thanks btw for trying to explain what you meant, but I already know what you meant.

rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
May 11, 2011 8:56pm
Awwww do you need a hug? But like I stated what I said was clear and my clarification was clearer. You can twist it but the fact is there are succesful public schools that will vote it down. Also how was anything you said an opinion? You pretty much took what I said and discounted it and came up with something that was totally different. But thats just my different opinion I guess.

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 11, 2011 9:12pm
Congrats, you made it through a post without calling someone a name, although the hug part seemed slightly sarcastic.
OF COURSE there are successful publics that will vote it down. I'm sure there are mediocre publics that will vote it down also. Thanks for letting us in on the inside info.
OF COURSE there are successful publics that will vote it down. I'm sure there are mediocre publics that will vote it down also. Thanks for letting us in on the inside info.

rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
May 11, 2011 9:51pm
So then why respond to my post with your nonsense?

Big Al Carter
Posts: 431
May 12, 2011 5:28am
skank, I love reading your post in this thread. You make points, and everyone else resorts to name calling, and repeated mantra's. I hope your Tigers will someday join my Federal League, to make a good league, GREAT.
Go Vikings! Go Tigers!
Go Vikings! Go Tigers!
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
May 12, 2011 10:20am
Big Al Carter;766051 wrote:skank, I love reading your post in this thread. You make points,
Seriously???
Spewing the same inane nonsense, to me, isn't "making points"

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 12, 2011 12:08pm
Rocket08;766206 wrote:Seriously???
Spewing the same inane nonsense, to me, isn't "making points"
Yeah, I guess you're right, I should be childishly calling people names that don't agree with me.
And to think "you people" fancy yourselves better.

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 12, 2011 12:13pm
My nonsense? Aren't you the one who told US how certain schools will vote? You know how every school will vote? You have a inside relationship with an AD or coach at all of those schools, and they told you how they are going to vote? Furthermore, you keep claiming that SS will play anybody put in front of them, yet, they have scheduled 1 parochial school in the past, (at least), 9 years? I've looked at the Southview schedule, and let's just say, it isn't indicative of your tough talk.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
May 12, 2011 1:47pm
Once again
We've heard (and ignored) all of that pap before
Get a new whine
We've heard (and ignored) all of that pap before
Get a new whine

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 12, 2011 4:10pm
Rocket08;766206 wrote:Seriously???
Spewing the same inane nonsense, to me, isn't "making points"
Yeah, and gems like this one are fresh.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
May 12, 2011 4:54pm
Nice comeback
You should be proud
See the 7?
V
You should be proud
See the 7?
V

rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
May 12, 2011 4:55pm
skank my friend you are clearly losing it I stated that the kids at SS will play whomever the AD schedules as well as if in the playoffs the team public or private. But this was after you went to the left regarding my other post regarding succesful programs that will vote it down. When did I say I knew all the ADs or coaches? Just like the Massillon kids have no control over their schedule neither do ours. But you cant tell me they will not strap up and play whomever is scheduled. So go ahead and twist that!
Y
YtownIrish
Posts: 10
May 12, 2011 11:51pm
skank;694652 wrote:I'll take this as an admission of guilt.
You would!
V
Viking
Posts: 350
May 13, 2011 6:36pm
Some fool on here posted that no DI schools would vote yes on the current proposal. In today's PD the Cuyahoga Falls principal explains why she voted YES. Change is coming.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
May 13, 2011 6:45pm
Viking;767760 wrote:Some fool on here posted that no DI schools would vote yes on the current proposal. In today's PD the Cuyahoga Falls principal explains why she voted YES. Change is coming.
That vote should put it over the top

mvred
Posts: 228
May 14, 2011 10:35am
Honestly do you really think I care if we move up? Hell No. The beauty of this competitive balance proposal is Division 1 and Division 2 will be loaded with Catholic schools, meaning Massillon will continue to never win a state title on the field... #FACT
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
May 14, 2011 12:57pm
Nice

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 14, 2011 4:10pm
Hell no I don't think you care if you guys move up, with the talent you and Mooney are attracting, you guys should move up to NAIA.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
May 15, 2011 11:53am
Thank you
We finally agree. We are THAT good
We finally agree. We are THAT good

1_beast
Posts: 5,642
May 15, 2011 4:09pm
Everyone else agrees too...thats why you have problems scheduling HIGH SCHOOL teams.Rocket08;768575 wrote:Thank you
We finally agree. We are THAT good

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 15, 2011 4:30pm
Rocket08;768575 wrote:Thank you
We finally agree. We are THAT good
Your recruiting coordinator is that good. He should be making $100,000 a year....Ursulines should make $120,000.

sherm03
Posts: 7,349
May 15, 2011 4:44pm
skank;768783 wrote:Your recruiting coordinator is that good. He should be making $100,000 a year....Ursulines should make $120,000.
We can't afford to pay them that much. Too many athletes are going for free, so there's no money to pay the recruiters that much.

skank
Posts: 6,543
May 15, 2011 5:04pm
sherm03;768797 wrote:We can't afford to pay them that much. Too many athletes are going for free, so there's no money to pay the recruiters that much.
It is kind of a catch 22, poor dude might work himself out of a job.

1_beast
Posts: 5,642
May 15, 2011 5:30pm
Ahhh the irony of vouchers....
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
May 15, 2011 7:01pm
Well I took 4 weeks off and my boy Skank is still beating that dead horse. Back to hibernation.skank;768783 wrote:Your recruiting coordinator is that good. He should be making $100,000 a year....Ursulines should make $120,000.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=768783