Interesting new plan on reducing the debt/deficit

Politics 53 replies 2,290 views
derek bomar's avatar
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Nov 10, 2010 3:00pm
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-10/deficit-panel-s-plan-would-seek-to-cut-social-security-mortgage-deduction.html

3 tax brackets and no tax breaks
cuts in SS/medicare
discretionary cuts

what say ye? personally, I'm intrigued by the 3 tax-bracket thing and no tax breaks...would make for filing your taxes pretty painless...
tk421's avatar
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Nov 10, 2010 3:22pm
Sounds pretty good to me, but people are bitching right now about the rich not paying their fair share, no way they go for a top tax bracket of 23%.
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 10, 2010 3:23pm
http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/CoChair_Draft.pdf
There is the official draft of proposals announced.


Initial reaction, not bad and a shift in the right direction.
Belly35's avatar
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Nov 10, 2010 3:28pm
This sound like a Obama save the remaining Democrat ass plan.....
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 10, 2010 3:39pm
Belly35;552822 wrote:This sound like a Obama save the remaining Democrat ass plan.....

Could have fooled me. It's a bipartisan commission and one set of the recommendations include:
Proposal: Discretionary Spending Caps

Rolls discretionary spending back to FY2010 levels for FY2012, requires 1% cut in discretionary budget authority every year from FY2013 though 2015

Discretionary Budget Authority (BA) indexed to inflation from FY 2015 through FY2020

Discretionary spending would be $204 billion (16%) below the President’s budget and $127 billion (10%) below the CBO baseline in 2015

Cap applied equally with firewall separating defense and non-defense (or security and non-security), and no borrowing across categories through 2015. New Congress will renegotiate firewalls beyond 2015.
Sounds like a good start.
Also, check out the cuts starting on page 19 of the link I provided. Good stuff there to start.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Nov 10, 2010 3:46pm
There is no ethical reason that anyone should have to pay triple the taxes as someone else on a percentage basis, and as a practical matter will not yield the desired results in the long term.

Turrible plan.
Fab4Runner's avatar
Fab4Runner
Posts: 6,196
Nov 10, 2010 4:51pm
Here is Esquire's plan...

http://www.esquire.com/features/balance-the-budget-findings-1110?click=main_sr

I read it in the actual magazine on my flight last night. There are also charts...not sure if you can see them on the website.
Ty Webb's avatar
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 10, 2010 4:55pm
Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 10, 2010 5:10pm
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
Considering the person making 14K doesn't pay any farking taxes, probably not.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 10, 2010 5:45pm
It's amazing how many of these points were brought up by us OC douche bags in this thread! http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/18953-What-would-you-cut-from-the-budget
CenterBHSFan's avatar
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Nov 10, 2010 5:48pm
believer;552984 wrote:It's amazing how many of these points were brought up by us OC douche bags in this thread! http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/18953-What-would-you-cut-from-the-budget

Alright, who's the mole?!
Belly35's avatar
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Nov 10, 2010 6:00pm
CenterBHSFan;552990 wrote:Alright, who's the mole?!
Has to be KnightRyder ....he is the only one who cut and paste and not tell anyone until after the fact..
Belly35's avatar
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Nov 10, 2010 6:16pm
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
Why should (for example me) pay more on the money I make/earn than you have to pay for the money you earn?
What makes my earned money more taxable than yours?
When did the teacher ever punish the A student, when did the coach bench the hard working player, when is what i work for and you didn't make yours less taxable than mine, why does success get fucked .... and the lazy rightous

Do you put your pants on one leg at a time so do I ....you have the same oppertuities to make money just like me.... what you do is your problem and if that not making money don't blame the wealthy... pay your taxes and i will pay the same rate for my money....

When is making less money an entitlement


Sorry I got a little carried away Ty this has nothing to do with you. i was a poor kid living in the project and everything i have earned required hard work and dedication. i value my labor and the fruits of my labor ... so you can see why i have those strong feeling of why tax me for earning and working for a goal only to be punished at the finish line.
Belly35's avatar
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Nov 10, 2010 6:17pm
ptown_trojans_1;552841 wrote:Could have fooled me. It's a bipartisan commission and one set of the recommendations include:

Sounds like a good start.
Also, check out the cuts starting on page 19 of the link I provided. Good stuff there to start.
Have not read everything yet ...but it could from what i have read a beginning of something positive
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Nov 11, 2010 6:08am
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?

Same rate? Yes.
F
fan_from_texas
Posts: 2,693
Nov 11, 2010 11:16am
The plan suggests eliminating the mortgage interest deduction. That's politically nigh-impossible to push through, as it pretty dramatically changes the economics of home buying for some people.
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 11, 2010 11:23am
Without having access to all of the details, it sounds like a great start. There is no way this would ever pass a vote, but I would support it 100%.
ernest_t_bass's avatar
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 11, 2010 11:51am
fan_from_texas;553693 wrote:The plan suggests eliminating the mortgage interest deduction. That's politically nigh-impossible to push through, as it pretty dramatically changes the economics of home buying for some people.

I'm just going to play idiot and not look it up, and ask for you to explain it to me. I probably already know the answer, but playing the idiot card.... what exactly is the "mortgage interest deduction?"
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 11, 2010 11:53am
ernest...Do you own a home?
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 11, 2010 11:54am
Ok, after reading the details, it is definitely a good start, but definitely not enough to solve the problem. I would definitely support it, but they need to cut more fat out of there.
ernest_t_bass's avatar
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 11, 2010 11:54am
Con_Alma;553723 wrote:ernest...Do you own a home?

Indeed. Actually in the process of buying another home.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 11, 2010 11:56am
Great! Do you file your own taxes or do you have an accountant do it for you?
ernest_t_bass's avatar
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 11, 2010 12:04pm
Con_Alma;553731 wrote:Great! Do you file your own taxes or do you have an accountant do it for you?

OK... no need to go any further. This idiot follows you a little clearer now. Tax credits for home owners and interest, correct?
F
fan_from_texas
Posts: 2,693
Nov 11, 2010 12:05pm
ernest_t_bass;553722 wrote:I'm just going to play idiot and not look it up, and ask for you to explain it to me. I probably already know the answer, but playing the idiot card.... what exactly is the "mortgage interest deduction?"


Here's a rough example (using some round numbers so the math is easy):

Say you make $100k. You buy a $300k home, with a 6% mortgage amortized over 30 yrs. Each payment is (roughly) $1,800, with $300 in principal and $1,500 in interest. So in year one you pay approximately $18,000 in interest.

You get to deduct this expense from your taxable income, so you're taxed as though you made $82k rather than $100k. When combined with the property tax deduction, this can become pretty significant.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 11, 2010 12:06pm
ernest_t_bass;553739 wrote:OK... no need to go any further. This idiot follows you a little clearer now. Tax credits for home owners and interest, correct?


Kind of. It's not a tax credit, however.

It's a deduction of the interest you paid.

It will reduce the income level you have to pay taxes on and ultimately your total tax liability.