Interesting new plan on reducing the debt/deficit

Home Archive Politics Interesting new plan on reducing the debt/deficit
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Nov 10, 2010 3:22 PM
Sounds pretty good to me, but people are bitching right now about the rich not paying their fair share, no way they go for a top tax bracket of 23%.
Nov 10, 2010 3:22pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Nov 10, 2010 3:28 PM
This sound like a Obama save the remaining Democrat ass plan.....
Nov 10, 2010 3:28pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Nov 10, 2010 3:39 PM
Belly35;552822 wrote:This sound like a Obama save the remaining Democrat ass plan.....

Could have fooled me. It's a bipartisan commission and one set of the recommendations include:
Proposal: Discretionary Spending Caps

Rolls discretionary spending back to FY2010 levels for FY2012, requires 1% cut in discretionary budget authority every year from FY2013 though 2015

Discretionary Budget Authority (BA) indexed to inflation from FY 2015 through FY2020

Discretionary spending would be $204 billion (16%) below the President’s budget and $127 billion (10%) below the CBO baseline in 2015

Cap applied equally with firewall separating defense and non-defense (or security and non-security), and no borrowing across categories through 2015. New Congress will renegotiate firewalls beyond 2015.
Sounds like a good start.
Also, check out the cuts starting on page 19 of the link I provided. Good stuff there to start.
Nov 10, 2010 3:39pm
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Nov 10, 2010 3:46 PM
There is no ethical reason that anyone should have to pay triple the taxes as someone else on a percentage basis, and as a practical matter will not yield the desired results in the long term.

Turrible plan.
Nov 10, 2010 3:46pm
Ty Webb's avatar

Ty Webb

Senior Member

2,798 posts
Nov 10, 2010 4:55 PM
Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
Nov 10, 2010 4:55pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Nov 10, 2010 5:10 PM
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
Considering the person making 14K doesn't pay any farking taxes, probably not.
Nov 10, 2010 5:10pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Nov 10, 2010 6:00 PM
CenterBHSFan;552990 wrote:Alright, who's the mole?!
Has to be KnightRyder ....he is the only one who cut and paste and not tell anyone until after the fact..
Nov 10, 2010 6:00pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Nov 10, 2010 6:16 PM
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?
Why should (for example me) pay more on the money I make/earn than you have to pay for the money you earn?
What makes my earned money more taxable than yours?
When did the teacher ever punish the A student, when did the coach bench the hard working player, when is what i work for and you didn't make yours less taxable than mine, why does success get fucked .... and the lazy rightous

Do you put your pants on one leg at a time so do I ....you have the same oppertuities to make money just like me.... what you do is your problem and if that not making money don't blame the wealthy... pay your taxes and i will pay the same rate for my money....

When is making less money an entitlement


Sorry I got a little carried away Ty this has nothing to do with you. i was a poor kid living in the project and everything i have earned required hard work and dedication. i value my labor and the fruits of my labor ... so you can see why i have those strong feeling of why tax me for earning and working for a goal only to be punished at the finish line.
Nov 10, 2010 6:16pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Nov 10, 2010 6:17 PM
ptown_trojans_1;552841 wrote:Could have fooled me. It's a bipartisan commission and one set of the recommendations include:

Sounds like a good start.
Also, check out the cuts starting on page 19 of the link I provided. Good stuff there to start.
Have not read everything yet ...but it could from what i have read a beginning of something positive
Nov 10, 2010 6:17pm
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Nov 11, 2010 6:08 AM
Ty Webb;552939 wrote:Queen city...you think someone making $2,000,000 should get to pay the same tax rate as someone making say $14,000?

Same rate? Yes.
Nov 11, 2010 6:08am
F

fan_from_texas

Senior Member

2,693 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:16 AM
The plan suggests eliminating the mortgage interest deduction. That's politically nigh-impossible to push through, as it pretty dramatically changes the economics of home buying for some people.
Nov 11, 2010 11:16am
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:23 AM
Without having access to all of the details, it sounds like a great start. There is no way this would ever pass a vote, but I would support it 100%.
Nov 11, 2010 11:23am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:51 AM
fan_from_texas;553693 wrote:The plan suggests eliminating the mortgage interest deduction. That's politically nigh-impossible to push through, as it pretty dramatically changes the economics of home buying for some people.

I'm just going to play idiot and not look it up, and ask for you to explain it to me. I probably already know the answer, but playing the idiot card.... what exactly is the "mortgage interest deduction?"
Nov 11, 2010 11:51am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:53 AM
ernest...Do you own a home?
Nov 11, 2010 11:53am
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:54 AM
Ok, after reading the details, it is definitely a good start, but definitely not enough to solve the problem. I would definitely support it, but they need to cut more fat out of there.
Nov 11, 2010 11:54am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:54 AM
Con_Alma;553723 wrote:ernest...Do you own a home?

Indeed. Actually in the process of buying another home.
Nov 11, 2010 11:54am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Nov 11, 2010 11:56 AM
Great! Do you file your own taxes or do you have an accountant do it for you?
Nov 11, 2010 11:56am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Nov 11, 2010 12:04 PM
Con_Alma;553731 wrote:Great! Do you file your own taxes or do you have an accountant do it for you?

OK... no need to go any further. This idiot follows you a little clearer now. Tax credits for home owners and interest, correct?
Nov 11, 2010 12:04pm
F

fan_from_texas

Senior Member

2,693 posts
Nov 11, 2010 12:05 PM
ernest_t_bass;553722 wrote:I'm just going to play idiot and not look it up, and ask for you to explain it to me. I probably already know the answer, but playing the idiot card.... what exactly is the "mortgage interest deduction?"


Here's a rough example (using some round numbers so the math is easy):

Say you make $100k. You buy a $300k home, with a 6% mortgage amortized over 30 yrs. Each payment is (roughly) $1,800, with $300 in principal and $1,500 in interest. So in year one you pay approximately $18,000 in interest.

You get to deduct this expense from your taxable income, so you're taxed as though you made $82k rather than $100k. When combined with the property tax deduction, this can become pretty significant.
Nov 11, 2010 12:05pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Nov 11, 2010 12:06 PM
ernest_t_bass;553739 wrote:OK... no need to go any further. This idiot follows you a little clearer now. Tax credits for home owners and interest, correct?


Kind of. It's not a tax credit, however.

It's a deduction of the interest you paid.

It will reduce the income level you have to pay taxes on and ultimately your total tax liability.
Nov 11, 2010 12:06pm