User: Tiernan
Infraction: Signature
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

This fucking guy...

Message to User:

You changed your signature from a personal attack on certain posters to a personal attack on the mod who pointed it out (and that doesn't make it "warranted"). Not sure what you're trying to prove, but it's not working.

EDIT: I removed his signature... I'm sure his next one will be a personal attack at me, so someone can take care of that one when they wake up, haha.

Just curious, what did his signature say about me?

Fly4Fun;551646 wrote:Just curious, what did his signature say about me?

He basically equated your username to a gay sex position. It made no sense at all to be honest. It was like "Fly4fun? the gay hobo said...." and I forget the rest, something like he had never tried that before and it sounded fun.

Either way, it was pretty obvious he was being his usual internet badass self and taking shots at you.

Something about how a gay hobo wants to "fly for fun". Can't remember it. Basically a "stupid asshole trying to be clever and witty, but failing" sort of thing.

Yup, that sounds just about right for that guy.

I love how each one of the typical problem children usually just throw a fit when we give them a simple infraction. It's an infraction that sticks around for a month and you have to receive quite a bit to actually be penalized... although I think Tiernan should be getting close again.

I about shit my pants when I gave bases_loaded an infraction today. It prompted me after I hit submit that it would result in a ban, so I had to give a ban reason (he is now banned for a week). I would guess Tiernan will be the next to get an automatic 7 days.

Is bases loaded the first to be banned since this whole infraction system was put in place?

I have never reached the infraction limit for someone to be banned, so as far as I know bases_loaded is.