Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 1, 2010 1:56pm
The concept is this.
You only have one bench spot.
There won't be many teams, only about six to eight.
You get a QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, K and D.
And then only that one bench spot. So you kind of have to be more aware of the bye weeks and pick players with different bye weeks.
The free agent pool will have a ton of good players. If you're not satisfied with one of your starters you can swap for another player on waivers but you will basically drop the player from your roster unless you're able to place that player in the one bench spot.
You only have one bench spot.
There won't be many teams, only about six to eight.
You get a QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, K and D.
And then only that one bench spot. So you kind of have to be more aware of the bye weeks and pick players with different bye weeks.
The free agent pool will have a ton of good players. If you're not satisfied with one of your starters you can swap for another player on waivers but you will basically drop the player from your roster unless you're able to place that player in the one bench spot.
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Sep 1, 2010 6:04pm
Non I'd be down sounds like this would be some fun.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 1, 2010 7:30pm
I like the idea...
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 1, 2010 7:44pm
I'll set it up later, either late tonight or tomorrow.
I'm going to keep the number of teams down because I think it will be better if there are more quality options in the free agent pool.
You also probably won't be able to take a bunch of good players from one team. Because when it comes to a bye week you'll only be able to keep one of them on the bench or you can leave a starter in and take no points for one week. A little different strategy involved.
I'm going to keep the number of teams down because I think it will be better if there are more quality options in the free agent pool.
You also probably won't be able to take a bunch of good players from one team. Because when it comes to a bye week you'll only be able to keep one of them on the bench or you can leave a starter in and take no points for one week. A little different strategy involved.
H
HeathAlum21
Posts: 363
Sep 1, 2010 7:57pm
Or, you could get players with the same bye week. You would basically be punting only one week, but would be at full strength for all the other weeks.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 1, 2010 8:09pm
That's right ^^
That might be the better way to go if your team is stacked and you think you can overcome that one week.
That might be the better way to go if your team is stacked and you think you can overcome that one week.
hangonsloopy
Posts: 1,291
Sep 1, 2010 10:34pm
Sounds cool. I'd try it.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 1, 2010 11:58pm
I think we'll have 8 teams.
so far if you're all in, that would mean:
Non
iliketurtles
wesmantooth
heathalum21
hangonsloopy
so far if you're all in, that would mean:
Non
iliketurtles
wesmantooth
heathalum21
hangonsloopy
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 2, 2010 12:28am
I'm in.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 2, 2010 5:42am
yeah, I am game.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Sep 2, 2010 9:47am
Im in
grodt
Posts: 1,588
Sep 2, 2010 10:12am
I'm in if there is still room
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Sep 5, 2010 9:28am
I have another yahoo draft at 8 tonight. If i open seperate pages i can do both at the same time right?
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 5, 2010 2:29pm
I believe so. ^^^
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 5, 2010 9:49pm
crapper....I forgot the draft was tonight.....I have like 4 or 5 guys with a week 10 bye...lol
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 5, 2010 9:59pm
I'll trade you Brady for Rodgers right now.