F
ffkapono
Posts: 97
Aug 17, 2010 8:58am
UGLY
B
barbarian
Posts: 82
Aug 17, 2010 9:06am
You didn't write UGLY correctly. It should be bold, underlined and italicized and probably a larger font if possible. UGLY
Or whatever synonym you want to use would work too: unattractive, unsightly, nasty....
Or whatever synonym you want to use would work too: unattractive, unsightly, nasty....
G
general94
Posts: 91
Aug 17, 2010 10:58am
The Wood better have all their freshmen dressed for this one.
B
bridgeport
Posts: 35
Aug 18, 2010 12:23am
VERY UGLY
F
ffkapono
Posts: 97
Aug 18, 2010 10:30am
Ridgewood 54 Trail 0
T
tigerfan82
Posts: 342
Aug 18, 2010 11:01am
What happened at Trail?????? I watched them play in the Play-offs just a couple of years ago......they even hosted that game. New coach or something????
B
barbarian
Posts: 82
Aug 18, 2010 11:31am
Yes that coach is gone, but I think he was there for the following year when they went 0-10. Trail just had a nice couple of classes. Most of their history has been dismal with a couple spikes here and there. When they had Jeff Snedegar in the mid-90's they were pretty good. Seems like they are a program of sub .500 teams with a great team or two every 12 years or so.
P
pretender
Posts: 25
Aug 18, 2010 8:28pm
If Trail is not that good why in the world did Ridgewood put them on there schedule for? No disrespect intended, just wondering why.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a84b/1a84bdf1fc792ff0fc5deeccd01e9ea2259bb26d" alt="xnds1fan's avatar"
xnds1fan
Posts: 442
Aug 18, 2010 8:41pm
How did Ridgewood look against Newark Catholic?
P
pretender
Posts: 25
Aug 18, 2010 9:19pm
I heard that they did not look very good against Newark Catholic but was not able to be there my self.
S
SilverHammer
Posts: 19
Aug 19, 2010 7:50am
The Varsity part of the scrimmage ended up 1-1. NC scored on a long pass, Ridgewood on a long run. They ran three series of 10 plays each I believe.
B
barbarian
Posts: 82
Aug 19, 2010 10:03am
pretender;455485 wrote:If Trail is not that good why in the world did Ridgewood put them on there schedule for? No disrespect intended, just wondering why.
Was wondering that myself. Ridgewood went 10-0 last year and only got the 6th seed. Undefeated teams should get a week 11 home game at the very least. Then they replaced their only good ooc team in Shadyside with Buckeye Trail. Trail might win 2 games but I doubt it. Unless River View is expecting a big year, Ridgewood can't rely on much OOC Harbin points at least from SCC and Trail. I don't know what Ridgewood is expecting to have, but if Reg 19 is as tough to get in as it was last year then 9-1 won't get you in. 10-0 might not if 19 is what it was last year.
G
general94
Posts: 91
Aug 19, 2010 10:51am
I think they scheduled Trail after 2007 when they went 10-0, and nobody expected SCC to fall on the hard times they are having now. You never know when you schedule teams 2-3 years in advance. I agree though, the Wood will probably have to run the table this year to even sniff the postseason, as the IVC will probably be subpar again too. I would have liked to seen Shadyside stay on, and I wish RV was off all together.
B
barbarian
Posts: 82
Aug 19, 2010 11:07am
On Trail's end I think they are overscheduling. Ridgewood was a state semifinal team last year. Barnesville is a tough D5 team no matter what they have. And Linsly is a private academy that you never know what you will be getting. This year Linsly is loaded. St. Johns is a winnable game for Trail. Kudos to Trail for playing such a rough ooc schedule but they may want to tone it down a little.
B
barbarian
Posts: 82
Aug 19, 2010 11:09am
Ridgewood should give Barnvesville a call. That's a good matchup and a good points game for both teams. Barnesville can usually be counted on for points. They did have a down year recently, but usually they have a solid program.
S
SilverHammer
Posts: 19
Aug 19, 2010 5:48pm
Next Year Ridgewood Will have Applecreek Waynedale in week two, and a good chance that Shadyside will be week three to replace Riverview from what I here. Problem is, thats next year.
G
general94
Posts: 91
Aug 19, 2010 7:50pm
^^^^^Sounds good. As for this year, I believe the Wood is very capable of running the table. Just do that boys and let the chips fall.
T
tigerfan82
Posts: 342
Aug 20, 2010 10:00am
the way Hiland is loading up, running the table might be tough 94.............oops, damn, sorry about that buddy....wrong sport
F
ffkapono
Posts: 97
Aug 23, 2010 9:04am
Who are some key players for the wood?