data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 22, 2009 1:24pm
1 Florida (36) 11-0 1463 1
2 Alabama (13) 11-0 1428 2
3 Texas (11) 11-0 1425 3
4 TCU 11-0 1309 4
5 Cincinnati 10-0 1245 5
6 Boise State 11-0 1218 6
7 Georgia Tech 10-1 1138 7
8 Pittsburgh 9-1 1041 8
9 Ohio State 10-2 1016 9
10 Oregon 9-2 983 11
11 Oklahoma State 9-2 793 12
12 Penn State 10-2 773 13
13 Iowa 10-2 766 15
14 Virginia Tech 8-3 675 16
15 Clemson 8-3 609 18
16 Oregon State 8-3 541 20
17 LSU 8-3 409 10
18 Brigham Young 9-2 399 19
19 Miami (FL) 8-3 347 21
20 Mississippi 8-3 333 NR
21 California 8-3 263 NR
22 Utah 9-2 249 23
23 North Carolina 8-3 237 NR
24 USC 7-3 225 22
25 Houston 9-2 199 24
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings?poll=1&week=13
2 Alabama (13) 11-0 1428 2
3 Texas (11) 11-0 1425 3
4 TCU 11-0 1309 4
5 Cincinnati 10-0 1245 5
6 Boise State 11-0 1218 6
7 Georgia Tech 10-1 1138 7
8 Pittsburgh 9-1 1041 8
9 Ohio State 10-2 1016 9
10 Oregon 9-2 983 11
11 Oklahoma State 9-2 793 12
12 Penn State 10-2 773 13
13 Iowa 10-2 766 15
14 Virginia Tech 8-3 675 16
15 Clemson 8-3 609 18
16 Oregon State 8-3 541 20
17 LSU 8-3 409 10
18 Brigham Young 9-2 399 19
19 Miami (FL) 8-3 347 21
20 Mississippi 8-3 333 NR
21 California 8-3 263 NR
22 Utah 9-2 249 23
23 North Carolina 8-3 237 NR
24 USC 7-3 225 22
25 Houston 9-2 199 24
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings?poll=1&week=13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Nov 22, 2009 1:28pm
seems about right... I would put Texas at 2 though.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Nov 22, 2009 1:29pm
I thought OSU would jump an idle Pitt, that is usually how it goes. But Pitt would eventually jump OSU with more games to be played.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95644/956443972e66a09edef86ba74c9e8901a36a5480" alt="dwccrew's avatar"
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 22, 2009 1:59pm
As long as OSU finishes in the top ten, I'll be happy. That means a bowl game win.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 22, 2009 2:06pm
AP poll doesn't mean anything. Here is the USA Today Coaches Poll
RK TEAM RECORD PTS
1 Florida (47) 11-0 1459
2 Texas (4) 11-0 1398
3 Alabama (8) 11-0 1388
4 TCU 11-0 1279
5 Cincinnati 10-0 1224
6 Boise State 11-0 1181
7 Georgia Tech 10-1 1125
8 Ohio State 10-2 1031
9 Pittsburgh 9-1 1021
10 Oregon 9-2 941
11 Penn State 10-2 843
12 Oklahoma State 9-2 815
13 Iowa 10-2 714
14 Virginia Tech 8-3 656
15 Brigham Young 9-2 510
16 Clemson 8-3 467
17 LSU 8-3 463
18 Oregon State 8-3 450
19 Utah 9-2 318
20 Houston 9-2 305
21 Miami (FL) 8-3 266
22 USC 7-3 261
23 Nebraska 8-3 191
24 North Carolina 8-3 167
25 Mississippi 8-3 165
RK TEAM RECORD PTS
1 Florida (47) 11-0 1459
2 Texas (4) 11-0 1398
3 Alabama (8) 11-0 1388
4 TCU 11-0 1279
5 Cincinnati 10-0 1224
6 Boise State 11-0 1181
7 Georgia Tech 10-1 1125
8 Ohio State 10-2 1031
9 Pittsburgh 9-1 1021
10 Oregon 9-2 941
11 Penn State 10-2 843
12 Oklahoma State 9-2 815
13 Iowa 10-2 714
14 Virginia Tech 8-3 656
15 Brigham Young 9-2 510
16 Clemson 8-3 467
17 LSU 8-3 463
18 Oregon State 8-3 450
19 Utah 9-2 318
20 Houston 9-2 305
21 Miami (FL) 8-3 266
22 USC 7-3 261
23 Nebraska 8-3 191
24 North Carolina 8-3 167
25 Mississippi 8-3 165
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 22, 2009 2:08pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 22, 2009 2:13pm
yeah I see that. Just went ahead and posted the poll anyways because the AP poll is irrelevant. It has as much bearing as my little cousin's rankings that he did in crayonCleveland Buck wrote: http://www.freehuddle.com/thread-1521.html
B
Buckeye2B
Posts: 66
Nov 22, 2009 4:44pm
I love all of the undefeated teams though. When its over, we once again will have a BCS failure. It's playoff time in some way, shape, or form.
T
trep14
Posts: 842
Nov 22, 2009 4:53pm
Yup, someone is going to be on the outside looking in. I'm looking forward to seeing the day when some mid-major team crashes the NC game party.Buckeye2B wrote: I love all of the undefeated teams though. When its over, we once again will have a BCS failure. It's playoff time in some way, shape, or form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 22, 2009 4:58pm
If everybody can stay undefeated (I know Florida plays Bama) it is really going to cause some real chaos. Florida/Bama, Texas, Cincy, Boise, TCU could all potentially be undefeated at the end. Its obvious as to who would make it. -Texas vs. SEC- but the NCAA may really have to reconsider the status quo if there are 3 others without a loss at the end of the season...trep14 wrote:Yup, someone is going to be on the outside looking in. I'm looking forward to seeing the day when some mid-major team crashes the NC game party.Buckeye2B wrote: I love all of the undefeated teams though. When its over, we once again will have a BCS failure. It's playoff time in some way, shape, or form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d10d5/d10d5861050e03df27d5dd6c67b9462dae59e498" alt="ohiotiger33's avatar"
ohiotiger33
Posts: 1,500
Nov 22, 2009 5:00pm
You can claim MNC with the AP poll so I wouldn't call it irrelevant. And don't you wouldnt do the same thing as USC and claim MNC because every fan would.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Nov 22, 2009 5:01pm
I disagree. If Texas, Florida, TCU, Cincy, & Boise are all still undefeated. The consensus will be Fla & Texas in the title game. I don't think there will be any chaos.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 22, 2009 5:04pm
I am pretty sure if you took a breath and read what I wrote you would have seen that I said the same thing. However, the chance that there is 3 other undefeateds at the end will surely cause ESPN and Congress to speak out on the issue.se-alum wrote: I disagree. If Texas, Florida, TCU, Cincy, & Boise are all still undefeated. The consensus will be Fla & Texas in the title game. I don't think there will be any chaos.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 22, 2009 5:25pm
If TCU remains unbeaten, I think they have serious beef to the National title game. The way they are playing, they could easily hang with and beat Texas, Bama or Florida.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 22, 2009 5:27pm
not just TCU, but also Boise and Cincy too. If you have 4 teams finish undefeated here (which very well could happen), you need to push for a playoff. Or claim your own national championship
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 22, 2009 5:29pm
If Cincy finishes unbeaten then, yeah, I'll throw them in the mix with TCU. As for Boise, they haven't looked great this season and I'm not sure they could hang with the top 5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 22, 2009 5:33pm
But they're undefeated. I know what everyone will say about the WAC, and yes they had some close wins, but they didn't lose to anybody.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 22, 2009 5:44pm
Texas played Wyoming on Sept. 12th. A week earlier Alabama was playing VA Tech. How come you aren't outraged about that?ccrunner609 wrote: After the cupcakes that were played this past weekend, Texas should be #1
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Nov 22, 2009 5:50pm
Every team plays cupcakes, the SEC schedule is different than most and it has teams playing OOC late in the season.ccrunner609 wrote: After the cupcakes that were played this past weekend, Texas should be #1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 22, 2009 5:54pm
its like an extra bye week before Florida plays FSU and Bama plays Auburn. In Florida's case, they've had about 3 or 4 bye weeks with Vandy on the schedule
J
JoeA1010
Posts: 191
Nov 22, 2009 5:58pm
Just as Alabama was given credit in the polls after it beat Va. Tech, it should be hurt after playing UT Chatanooga. That's why polls are done weekly. The teams that play cupcakes early in the season are penalized by the pollsters at that time, no reason Florida and Alabama shouldn't be now. Either teams will be penalized for playing cupcakes or they won't. It shouldn't be one set of rules for a couple of teams and another set for the rest of the country.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 22, 2009 6:01pm
^^^
I'm trying to understand this logic, but either way you cut it its still 2 blowout wins
I'm trying to understand this logic, but either way you cut it its still 2 blowout wins