Ty Webb;1270544 wrote:If you can't admit that this race nationally(and more specificlly Ohio) is trending towards an Obama victory you've got some MAJOR republican blinders on sir
LOL. Sure thing, Bro. :rolleyes:
Sep 14, 2012 9:48am
QuakerOats
Senior Member
Q
8,740posts
Q
QuakerOats
Senior Member
8,740
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 9:55 AM
Ty Webb;1270544 wrote:If you can't admit that this race nationally(and more specificlly Ohio) is trending towards an Obama victory you've got some MAJOR republican blinders on sir
Romney is up in Columbiana County by 20 points. That translates into a Romney win in Ohio.
Sep 14, 2012 9:55am
BGFalcons82
Senior Member
2,173posts
BGFalcons82
Senior Member
2,173
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 10:34 AM
Morris was on Greta's show last night. Here's the background for a great Romney ad -
MORRIS: But the important point here from -- for politics -- because that's what I'm here to talk about -- is not so much why the Muslims came after us -- probably was retaliation for the killing of one of their al Qaeda leaders and possibly September 11. I don't think the movie was anything more than a pretext.But the real question is what is the political impact of a president who is so busy campaigning that, number one, he can't meet with Netanyahu during a period of crisis because he's far too busy on Letterman that night, and secondly, who misses half of his intelligence briefings, and thirdly, didn't take serious warnings 48 hours in advance that this attack was going to happen, and finally, approved an American diplomatic embassy statement apologizing for the video and condemning it, rather than condemning the violence. Then he walked the statement back...
Choosing Letterman over Bibi
Campaigning over boring dreary intelligence briefings
No real grasp of the outcomes of our nation's biggest travesty of all time, 9-11
Yeah, this guy's a real leader. More like dereliction of duty. What happens if he should acquire "more flexibility", like he told the Russians?
Sep 14, 2012 10:34am
Ty Webb
Senior Member
2,798posts
Ty Webb
Senior Member
2,798
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 10:58 AM
QuakerOats;1270660 wrote:Romney is up in Columbiana County by 20 points. That translates into a Romney win in Ohio.
So Romney being up 20 points in a county that is 97 percent White guarantees a Romney win in Ohio?
Please explain the logic behind that Quaker!
Sep 14, 2012 10:58am
QuakerOats
Senior Member
Q
8,740posts
Q
QuakerOats
Senior Member
8,740
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 12:03 PM
It's a 50/50 county -- dems/repubs; you figure it out.
Sep 14, 2012 12:03pm
IggyPride00
Senior Member
6,482posts
IggyPride00
Senior Member
6,482
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 12:06 PM
Choosing Letterman over Bibi
I don't blame him on that one.
Not sure I would feel like listening to Bibi for the millionth time about how it is our responsibiity to shell out hundreds of billions and thousands of our soldiers to start a war with Iran either if I had a choice.
Sep 14, 2012 12:06pm
Ty Webb
Senior Member
2,798posts
Ty Webb
Senior Member
2,798
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 12:51 PM
QuakerOats;1270804 wrote:It's a 50/50 county -- dems/repubs; you figure it out.
If its a 50/50 county....why didn't they endorse a single democrat in the 2010 election and why did tet vote for McCain in 2008
Sep 14, 2012 12:51pm
sleeper
Legend
27,879posts
sleeper
Legend
27,879
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 12:57 PM
Ty Webb;1270852 wrote:If its a 50/50 county....why didn't they endorse a single democrat in the 2010 election and why did tet vote for McCain in 2008
Probably because its a highly educated county.
Sep 14, 2012 12:57pm
QuakerOats
Senior Member
Q
8,740posts
Q
QuakerOats
Senior Member
8,740
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 2:12 PM
Ty Webb;1270852 wrote:If its a 50/50 county....why didn't they endorse a single democrat in the 2010 election and why did tet vote for McCain in 2008
Because the people here would rather work than stand around taking handouts like they do in Cuyahoga and Franklin counties.
Sep 14, 2012 2:12pm
BoatShoes
Senior Member
B
5,703posts
B
BoatShoes
Senior Member
5,703
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 2:26 PM
QuakerOats;1270927 wrote:Because the people here would rather work than stand around taking handouts like they do in Cuyahoga and Franklin counties.
Tell us more about these people taking handouts in Cuyahoga and Franklin County.
Sep 14, 2012 2:26pm
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
S
1,797posts
S
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
1,797
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 3:25 PM
QuakerOats;1270660 wrote:Romney is up in Columbiana County by 20 points. That translates into a Romney win in Ohio.
Well, that tells me he'll command the farm-boy and hick vote. That's all there are in Columbiana county, lol.
Sep 14, 2012 3:25pm
fish82
Senior Member
4,111posts
fish82
Senior Member
4,111
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 4:08 PM
Ty Webb;1270615 wrote:You wanna talk about a biased poll.....look at Rassmussen's newest poll. Romney up 3? That in no way jives with other National polls.
Scott isn't even trying to hide it anymore
Hide what? His unmatched record of accuracy?
Yeah, what a doosh that guy is. :rolleyes:
Sep 14, 2012 4:08pm
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
S
1,797posts
S
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
1,797
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 4:25 PM
fish82;1271082 wrote:Hide what? His unmatched record of accuracy?
Yeah, what a doosh that guy is. :rolleyes:
C'mon, Fish. We all know the only poll you like is the one which you agree with.
Sep 14, 2012 4:25pm
fish82
Senior Member
4,111posts
fish82
Senior Member
4,111
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 4:29 PM
stlouiedipalma;1271098 wrote:C'mon, Fish. We all know the only poll you like is the one which you agree with.
Don't we all?
That said, insinuating Rassy is somehow "biased" is silly.
Sep 14, 2012 4:29pm
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
S
1,797posts
S
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
1,797
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 4:36 PM
Well, for what it's worth I try to ignore them all and listen to Nate Silver. He tells me what I want to hear, lol.
Sep 14, 2012 4:36pm
fish82
Senior Member
4,111posts
fish82
Senior Member
4,111
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 5:14 PM
stlouiedipalma;1271104 wrote:Well, for what it's worth I try to ignore them all and listen to Nate Silver. He tells me what I want to hear, lol.
Indeed. Nate knows how to form an opinion, that's for sure.
Sep 14, 2012 5:14pm
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
S
1,797posts
S
stlouiedipalma
Senior Member
1,797
posts
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 11:46 PM
He has an excellent track record. You cannot argue with that.
Pretty hard to pin him down on his involvement when his own people are doing the investigation and he refuses to release all the documents.
Hence, we can glean that he's not guilty of any crimes, but is apparently rather unengaged and inattentive at his job.
Sep 20, 2012 9:07am
BGFalcons82
Senior Member
2,173posts
BGFalcons82
Senior Member
2,173
posts
Thu, Sep 20, 2012 9:56 AM
fish82;1275721 wrote:Pretty hard to pin him down on his involvement when his own people are doing the investigation and he refuses to release all the documents.
Hence, we can glean that he's not guilty of any crimes, but is apparently rather unengaged and inattentive at his job.
This.
The glee from the Holder-defenders regarding a rigged investigation only confirms that he's not doing the job he's being paid to perform. I wonder what else he doesn't know that he should?
