data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8150f/8150fbc60aa3d39b1244e5ae37f6ed7f3e87747b" alt="ernest_t_bass's avatar"
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jun 7, 2010 9:39am
Movie is awful. Just plain awful. It had some good killing scenes, but the acting, the humor.... Awful, just awful.
Anyone else seen it?
Anyone else seen it?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jun 7, 2010 9:46am
I saw it. Not as great as the first one, but not terrible. Typical sequel, never as good as the original.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19679/19679f2d8240857397e82d48401f6fc151dce3d6" alt="BORIStheCrusher's avatar"
BORIStheCrusher
Posts: 1,893
Jun 7, 2010 11:00am
The first one is awful too, I don't get what all the hype is about.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jun 7, 2010 11:04am
I wouldn't go so far as calling the first one awful, but I agree I don't get what people see in it that is great. The second one was incrementally worse. The second one was cheesy, campy and over the top, but then again so was the first one. Willem Dafoe should have won a "hammy" for his overacting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8150f/8150fbc60aa3d39b1244e5ae37f6ed7f3e87747b" alt="ernest_t_bass's avatar"
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jun 7, 2010 11:18am
Better directing and acting could have obviously made either film MUCH better, but that is the story for all films.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31a/7c31a46af98d5764bc2053a6a365e2674a9a9cf7" alt="derek bomar's avatar"
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Jun 7, 2010 12:13pm
I thought it was ok...wasn't as good as the first but not turble
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96ac2/96ac2fc0769c74cd59206b2c9a0e45f4fccdd29d" alt="thedynasty1998's avatar"
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Jun 7, 2010 1:14pm
I didn't even make it through the whole movie.