skank wrote:
Yes....But not better than a Chevy pick-up.
How cute! Skank's trying to be funny!
Apr 16, 2010 8:44pm
Automatik
Senior Member
14,632posts
Automatik
Senior Member
14,632
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:44 AMApr 17, 2010 12:44 AM
lol right.
But kudos to Ford for getting that amount of power in a 31k car.
Apr 16, 2010 8:44pm
ohiotiger33
Senior Member
1,500posts
ohiotiger33
Senior Member
1,500
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:44 AMApr 17, 2010 12:44 AM
Not all about the statistics for me. It is about the interior as well; its luxury and features are important.
Apr 16, 2010 8:44pm
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Q
7,117posts
Q
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
7,117
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:46 AMApr 17, 2010 12:46 AM
On a "bang for the buck" basis, a valid case could be made.
Apr 16, 2010 8:46pm
coyotes22
Go Tigers
11,298posts
coyotes22
Go Tigers
11,298
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:46 AMApr 17, 2010 12:46 AM
GoChiefs wrote:
skank wrote:
Yes....But not better than a Chevy pick-up.
How cute! Skank's trying to be funny!
Did you just say "cute" and "skank" in the same post?
GHEY!!!!!
Apr 16, 2010 8:46pm
Automatik
Senior Member
14,632posts
Automatik
Senior Member
14,632
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:46 AMApr 17, 2010 12:46 AM
I wonder if Ford ever took notice to improve the quality of their interiors. My friend has an '08 GT and the interior is chincy as hell.
Apr 16, 2010 8:46pm
ohiotiger33
Senior Member
1,500posts
ohiotiger33
Senior Member
1,500
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 12:47 AMApr 17, 2010 12:47 AM
^^ Same with every mustang I have ever been in. It is just shoddy interior workmanship.
Apr 16, 2010 8:47pm
I Wear Pants
Senior Member
I
16,223posts
I
I Wear Pants
Senior Member
16,223
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:39 AMApr 17, 2010 2:39 AM
I'm willing to bet the BMW lasts longer too.
Apr 16, 2010 10:39pm
wes_mantooth
Tomfoolery & shenanigans
17,977posts
wes_mantooth
Tomfoolery & shenanigans
17,977
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:42 AMApr 17, 2010 2:42 AM
Beamer fo sho.
Apr 16, 2010 10:42pm
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056posts
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:44 AMApr 17, 2010 2:44 AM
I'll take the Mustang and save myself $28k.
Apr 16, 2010 10:44pm
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056posts
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:50 AMApr 17, 2010 2:50 AM
If I'm spending a dumbass amount of money on a luxury car I'm getting this guy:
Apr 16, 2010 10:50pm
Stiffman
Stuntin' on my Gixxer!
512posts
Stiffman
Stuntin' on my Gixxer!
512
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:52 AMApr 17, 2010 2:52 AM
can i get leather, heated and memory front seats; leather rear seats; and all of the other BMW creature comforts in the mustang? if so, i'll take the mustang. if not, i'll take the beamer.
Apr 16, 2010 10:52pm
ThumperAC
Member
T
38posts
T
ThumperAC
Member
38
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:54 AMApr 17, 2010 2:54 AM
define "better"
Apr 16, 2010 10:54pm
september63
Senior Member
5,789posts
september63
Senior Member
5,789
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 2:55 AMApr 17, 2010 2:55 AM
Depends what you want. BMW has a far better luxury interior. Id guess the BMW would fare better after 100K miles too.
Apr 16, 2010 10:55pm
Fly4Fun
Senior Member
7,730posts
Fly4Fun
Senior Member
7,730
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 3:20 AMApr 17, 2010 3:20 AM
I'd take the BMW for many of the same reasons lifted above...
But we all know Zwick has a hard on for Mustangs so not surprised this would rock his world.
Apr 16, 2010 11:20pm
Emmett Brown
Senior Member
478posts
Emmett Brown
Senior Member
478
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 3:51 AMApr 17, 2010 3:51 AM
justincredible wrote:
If I'm spending a dumbass amount of money on a luxury car I'm getting this guy:
You can't afford that until you start charging $12 a year to all of us members.
Apr 16, 2010 11:51pm
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056posts
justincredible
Nick Mangold
32,056
posts
Sat, Apr 17, 2010 9:38 AMApr 17, 2010 9:38 AM
Emmett Brown wrote:
justincredible wrote:
If I'm spending a dumbass amount of money on a luxury car I'm getting this guy:
You can't afford that until you start charging $12 a year to all of us members.