lhslep134 wrote:
You guys can say whatever you want, but I'd much rather have my team miss 3 layups in the beginning of the game not the end of the game.
What you fail to take into account are all of the peripheral factors that go into a made basket.
Depending on the amount of time left, a shot carries a lot more sway and momentum in the second half, BY FAR. If this weren't true, then we wouldn't see so many damn large comebacks over the second half of a game. Not the mention in the college game, the pressure that these kids are under. It's a lot easier to lose your cool when you miss a layup in the second half as opposed to the first half.
Also, it puts a lot more pressure on both teams when a layup that could have cut it to 54-52 misses than one that would have made it 6-4. I honestly cannot see why you guys are so ignorant to this fact. It's blowing my mind.
Wow. You are completely failing to see the point, it is ridiculous. How can you argue that three missed layups in the beginning of the game are not just as important as three missed layups at the end of the game, especially given a two point outcome? Missed opportunities are missed opportunities period, especially when you are Butler and playing an opponent that is the caliber of Duke.
And blowing layups at the beginning of the game can certainly be important. How often do you see teams get buried at the beginning of the game and are unable to claw their way back? I would argue that one of the most important factors teams face on the road or at a neutral site, particularly in basketball since it is a game of runs, is taking the crowd out of the game early on.
The fact that no one is agreeing with you should tell you something....and no, its not that everyone else except for you is a moron...