I don't think so. I enjoyed it.....sleeper wrote: Lebron James is the greatest player to have ever picked up a basketball, but this article is lame and pointless.
.jpg)
No it's not. One could possibly make the case that the Nets have a better supporting cast and a team setup for the future more so than the Cavs do.september63 wrote: Did he say the NJ Nets, at 3-35, with no other additions, would win 55 games with LeBron James? I am a cavs and LBJ fan, but that comment it ridiculous!!
I'm with dynasty. Take away LeBron and how many games does this Cavs team win? 15? Put him on the Nets with all those complementary pieces, that team would win a lot of games and most certainly contend for the East. Remeber when the Cavs made the Finals with Eric Snow, Sasha Pavlovic, Z, Drew Gooden, etcseptember63 wrote: Did he say the NJ Nets, at 3-35, with no other additions, would win 55 games with LeBron James? I am a cavs and LBJ fan, but that comment it ridiculous!!
Only because the East is very weak except for 3 teams.jordo212000 wrote:I'm with dynasty. Take away LeBron and how many games does this Cavs team win? 15? Put him on the Nets with all those complementary pieces, that team would win a lot of games and most certainly contend for the East. Remeber when the Cavs made the Finals with Eric Snow, Sasha Pavlovic, Z, Drew Gooden, etcseptember63 wrote: Did he say the NJ Nets, at 3-35, with no other additions, would win 55 games with LeBron James? I am a cavs and LBJ fan, but that comment it ridiculous!!
Obviously the West is the better conference, especially top to bottom, but I would argue that as a whole the NBA is a little down this year. I only see 4 teams with a legit chance of getting to the Finals. However 3 of those teams are in the East and 1 is in the WestSkyhook79 wrote: Only because the East is very weak except for 3 teams.
Thats because the lakers are in the West.jordo212000 wrote:Obviously the West is the better conference, especially top to bottom, but I would argue that as a whole the NBA is a little down this year. I only see 3-4 teams with a legit chance of getting to the Finals. However 3 of those teams are in the East and 1 is in the WestSkyhook79 wrote: Only because the East is very weak except for 3 teams.
The Nets have won 3.jordo212000 wrote:I'm with dynasty. Take away LeBron and how many games does this Cavs team win? 15?september63 wrote: Did he say the NJ Nets, at 3-35, with no other additions, would win 55 games with LeBron James? I am a cavs and LBJ fan, but that comment it ridiculous!!
Yeah because MY BEST GUESS at how many games the Cavs would win without him is gospel. haha. Who knows how many they'd win. Mark it down the Nets, Knicks, WNBA team etc would all make the playoffs the second LeBron suited up for them.SportsAndLady wrote:
The Nets have won 3.
15>>>>>>3
Well don't fucking agree with someone who said the Nets role players are better than the Cavs role players, then put up your "best guess" at 15 wins, when the Nets have 3 fucking wins.jordo212000 wrote:Yeah because MY BEST GUESS at how many games the Cavs would win without him is gospel. haha. Who knows how many they'd win. Mark it down the Nets, Knicks, WNBA team etc would all make the playoffs the second LeBron suited up for them.SportsAndLady wrote:
The Nets have won 3.
15>>>>>>3
My bad. I guess I should have probably stated that I only agreed with parts of his post or certain ideas. My main point was that no matter where LeBron plays, including the Nets; that team would win a lot of games. (Disclaimer: I do not think the Nets supporting cast is better than Cleveland's)SportsAndLady wrote:
Well don't fucking agree with someone who said the Nets role players are better than the Cavs role players, then put up your "best guess" at 15 wins, when the Nets have 3 fucking wins.
skittles, skittlesseptember63 wrote: Calmmm down SportsandLady. I disagreed with his post too. You dont have to throw fboms at him because he has an opinion different than ours.
