isadore;1867322 wrote:or you will drive a car through the demonstrators.

QuakerOats;1867344 wrote:How about if I say an Our Father, a Hail Mary, and a Glory Be for you.

jmog;1867303 wrote:I said he held abolitionist views. He said slavery is morally and politically evil, that is the only proof I need for the statement I made.

You are, quite obviously, wrong here. Do some actual research on Robert E Lee rather than just spout crap you can find on Occupy Democrats FB page.

The three most interesting eras/wars in US history (at least to me) are The Revolutionary War, The Civil War, and WW2. In all 3 cases "we" were fighting against some form of oppression (King of England, Slavery, and Nazi Germany).

I have read as much as I can on these 3 eras and the Civil War era being the one I have spent the most time reading (mainly because it almost ripped this country apart). In my studies I would definitely say that while most of the southern generals/politicians were most undoubtedly racist men (Jefferson Davis was quite the racist, he wanted to just annex most of Mexico so they had more slave states), Robert E Lee was a good man who definitely held abolitionist views.

I mean he was almost the leader of the Union Army, President Lincoln had Lee as his first choice and gave him the offer first. Lee was a much better strategic battle minded General than Grant was. If Lee had gone with country over state, the Civil War probably would have ended MUCH faster than it did.

Some of the Lincoln letters to Lee before the war and to his own generals during the war were very interesting and telling stories from that era.

One of my favorites was a guy (going off memory on which battle) that fought for the US in the War of 1812 and in the Mexican-American War, who was very old come the Civil War. He lived in Pennsylvania and Gettysburg was his back yard. He found for the Union with literally his musket from the war of 1812, as a 70 year old man.

CenterBHSFan;1867308 wrote:BS, they've already started doing it? If you don't believe me, ask Bernie Sanders. After all, they de-platformed him. Twice. Milo isn't exactly the sharpest tool in the shed but he has been deplatformed by the left, including BLM also.

These two are politically polar opposites. What do they have in common? Maybe some whiteness going on? lol
Oh and Martin O'Malley was deplatformed by BLM too.

[video=youtube;aoRleNh_EEw][/video]


And when you have even TYT calling them out on it you've GOT to start understanding the nuances of denying speech is a part of subjugation, right??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElcJy5yZfvk

It's interesting to note that Bernie Sanders fought within the vicinity in one way or another for 50 solid years. I personally think he's a whacko but I can't discredit that kind of sustained dedication. But BLM didn't think twice about shutting down his speech and one activist within BLM even said that he had to "go home and do some homework"... wut

Obviously what BLM has in written word is going to be much different than their actions. I do find it suspect that you continued pointing out the creed of BLM when the news on the above incidents where published EVERYWHERE that absolutely disclaim what BLM has written down.

QuakerOats;1867344 wrote:....with my Trump mask on


Christ you have a ton of media-hyped hatred coursing through your system.

How about if I say an Our Father, a Hail Mary, and a Glory Be for you.

CenterBHSFan;1867349 wrote:Just throw in a "Peace be upon you" for good measure!

BoatShoes;1867352 wrote: And so again, while I don't agree with "deplatforming" - IMHO doesn't mean they want to oppress whites.

iclfan2;1867426 wrote:You literally can't make this shit up. CNN saying ramming a car into a guy in Barcelona could be a copy cat of Charlottesville. Ummmm Islamic terrorists have been doing this for years. Such terrible reporting.
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/898257666346074112

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2;1867426 wrote:You literally can't make this shit up. CNN saying ramming a car into a guy in Barcelona could be a copy cat of Charlottesville. Ummmm Islamic terrorists have been doing this for years. Such terrible reporting.

CenterBHSFan;1867349 wrote:Just throw in a "Peace be upon you" for good measure!

gut;1867429 wrote:They SOOOOO wanted that to be the case, too.

I don't consider Charlottesville terror because I figure as long as I don't join an Antifa anti-supremacy rally I won't be struck in a crowd by a car driven by a nazi.

I wonder if the left REALLY wants to support Antifa, because they don't strike me exactly as the sort to remain loyal to the liberal agenda.

Heretic;1867540 wrote:True, no point in using the actual dictionary definition of terrorism when you can just victim-blame and call it a day!

Heretic;1867531 wrote:Or if you want something based in something a bit closer to reality: ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

Heretic;1867550 wrote:Yeah, intent would be tricky to legit prove, although dude looks dumb enough to have a crazy-ass manifesto somewhere like Dylan Root did. It's not like anyone he would have hypothetically told intentions to would say anything, since they'd be in his little Klan Klique.

QuakerOats;1867512 wrote:Blacks who were never slaves, fighting whites who were never Nazis, over a statue erected by democrats ...........and it's all Trump's fault.



Makes sense.