I'm mostly on side of having to draft a QB, but I can also see a situation that they go BPA if the QB they want isn't there, then maybe take a shot at Garopollo(sp?) with the 2nd pick or the 2nd rounder. It's hard not to trust that Farmer will make the right moves.HighRoller74;1580524 wrote:I agree we need to try and get a QB at 4, but I don't want the team to just take a QB, for the sake of taking one.
Once the front office is able to separate their guy, I'd prefer them to go through and rank every player separate and take best available player, don't want to be pigeonholed into a QB who might be the 16th/17th rated prospect just because.
For example:
Browns feel Bortles is top QB available, if he's there when we pick, done deal, if not go to best available if its another QB awesome if not, the Browns are talented, but aren't exactly 1 player away from the super bowl, so should take best available player (To an Extent)
Bortles
Then:
Robinson
Clowney
Watkins
Teddy
Barr
etc.
se-alum
The Biggest Boss
13,948
posts
se-alum
The Biggest Boss
13,948
posts
Thu, Feb 13, 2014 11:38 PM
Feb 13, 2014 11:38 PM
Feb 13, 2014 11:38pm