Pick6;1643963 wrote: There isn't room for two #1s.
The rest of your post isn't wrong, but his part is wrong.
ATL disagrees with you with White and Jones.
Chicago disagrees with you with Jeffrey and Marshall.
GB disagrees with you with Cobb and Nelson.
Going back in time:
Peyton disagrees with you with Wayne and Harrison.
The best show on turf disagrees with you with Holt and Bruce.
Marino disagrees with you with Duper and Clayton.
The 49ers disagree with you with Owens and Rice.
The Vikings disagree with you with Moss and Carter.
The Steelers disagree with you with Stallworth and Swan.
The 49ers disagree with you again with Rice and Taylor.
I could keep going but you get the idea. Having 2 #1 WRs is NOT a bad thing. Having no #1s (which is what the Browns have had since we came back until Gordon) is a bad thing.