Fly4Fun;1463396 wrote:No, the posts aren't deleted but unapproved. The point here is that if there are a few people accusing me of improperly moderating, I should be able to defend myself with the facts of what the content of the posts were that warranted the moderation, otherwise, how would I defend myself? Otherwise there really isn't much I could say to defend myself is there? So therefore we'd have to take each accusation as true, wouldn't we?
I think that's normal procedure for these threads once the work day is over and most people have shared their opinion on the matter.Trueblue23;1463401 wrote:I'm turning this into a stupid pictures thread.
Feel free to rename.
Or just the ones that derail into a handicapped argument over irrelevant issues, like most of them.Fly4Fun;1463405 wrote:I think that's normal procedure for these threads once the work day is over and most people have shared their opinion on the matter.
Fly4Fun;1463396 wrote:No, the posts aren't deleted but unapproved. The point here is that if there are a few people accusing me of improperly moderating, I should be able to defend myself with the facts of what the content of the posts were that warranted the moderation, otherwise, how would I defend myself? Otherwise there really isn't much I could say to defend myself is there? So therefore we'd have to take each accusation as true, wouldn't we?
It doesn't/didn't work, so drop it.said_aouita;1463397 wrote:It's called sarcasm.
I was trying to make a joke.
For someone with the name of "Devils Advocate" it is surprising that you seem to hate it when someone is arguing the other side.Devils Advocate;1463409 wrote:Unapproved.....deleted.....what ever.
Your post defending your self and adding a rather lengthy analogy about attorney/cli nt privileges is exactly why you come off as a pompous rectal discharge mechanism. I agree that muck of this is petty, why not you be the bigger man and just blow it off so to speak?
Most no moderation is better moderation.
Campeche?
I argue the other side all the time. Just not yours.Fly4Fun;1463411 wrote:For someone with the name of "Devils Advocate" it is surprising that you seem to hate it when someone is arguing the other side.
Despite your last two posts, still sad to see you go. I personally have never had a problem with your opinions or the way you conduct yourself. I'm sorry the feeling wasn't mutual.Devils Advocate;1463431 wrote:I argue the other side all the time. Just not yours.
You are a lost cause.... And you., and only you have lost another poster.
Peace out asshole.
I have had to clear my inbox for other pms unfortunately. However, you yourself even thought cry4fail's basement ban for me a couple months ago was weak. You said so yourself (publicly, don't remember the thread though), but you maintained the ban because I am an asshole. LOL. Just get it over with and add the rules "you can't be meanjustincredible;1463205 wrote:Please post these PMs.
" and "you can't bust balls."
Fly4Fun;1463411 wrote:For someone with the name of "Devils Advocate" it is surprising that you seem to hate it when someone is arguing the other side.
The bigger issue was combining like_that's thread with ETB's. That was seriously unnecessary. It moved completely away from talking about said's love for Graham wrestling and Bo Jordan's physique. You merged them back together and caused a shit storm.Fly4Fun;1463369 wrote:He was... he's just not raising a big stink about it.
I'm honestly not sure why it should be required that I don't defend myself when I'm constantly being attacked by the same people over and over again? DA didn't even say he had a problem with my moderation. His previous posts just here said he has a problem with how I defend myself, how I write and my opinions. That has nothing to do with my moderation. I can't help it if the guy personally doesn't like me. And I can certainly say I've never intentionally been a dick to him or even unintentionally done so to the best of my knowledge. Hell, I didn't even respond in a hostile or defensive manner to his last two posts where he resorts to name calling.Curly J;1463436 wrote:
Okay Justin and the rest of the OC, I have to admit I've never had an issue with F4F, but reading what I've read on this thread I can see why people do. And for him to piss of someone as easy going as Devils Advocate, well something isn't right. I never saw a Mod take himself so Serious, in such a smug way. I only wish us posters were just important as him.
I saw what COA posted about being warned by other Mods to 'lay off' and 'be careful' made me think harder into this. Looks like F4F has gone Rogue and wants certain posters gone from this site. Now he just ran off DA? What's next?
Maybe it's time I take a break myself for a while since we, as posters suck, and should be talked down to when we question a Mod and their practices. Maybe someone is taking Serious Business to it's word. (maybe it's me, maybe not)
It is pretty simple. You can simply not abuse your mod powers and come off as a smug asshole about it. Not sure how you can't comprehend that. There are plenty of people on this site who don't like me, however if I was mod, I wouldn't be a bitch and campaign and strategize to find ways to abuse my powers against them.Fly4Fun;1463439 wrote:I'm honestly not sure why it should be required that I don't defend myself when I'm constantly being attacked by the same people over and over again? DA didn't even say he had a problem with my moderation. His previous posts just here said he has a problem with how I defend myself, how I write and my opinions. That has nothing to do with my moderation. I can't help it if the guy personally doesn't like me. And I can certainly say I've never intentionally been a dick to him or even unintentionally done so to the best of my knowledge. Hell, I didn't even respond in a hostile or defensive manner to his last two posts where he resorts to name calling.
This seems like a situation where I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't.
repslike_that;1463442 wrote:It is pretty simple. You can simply not abuse your mod powers and come off as a smug asshole about it. Not sure how you can't comprehend that. There are plenty of people on this site who don't like me, however if I was mod, I wouldn't be a bitch and campaign and strategize to find ways to abuse my powers against them.
No one has tampered with the poll. Forums often have people that read but don't post often. Hell, I think I read JJ for over a full year before I ever posted.like_that;1463447 wrote:I call bullshit on this poll too. Like I said it was skewed when our names were originally placed in it, and also when was the last time we had 42 people vote in one day? The last time I can think of it was during the "GOAT" competition and that was because posters would go on PM campaigns to get people to vote. I can't remember the last time I have seen cat_lover (and his/her .78 posts per day) and that_guy post. Keep it up though justin/cry4fail. You will see the true impact of your stubbornness.
If the poll was simply "should cry4fail be a mod" it would not be the same result. I can tell you right now, ETB who bitches about you all the time would not have voted for you in that poll.Fly4Fun;1463448 wrote:No one has tampered with the poll. Forums often have people that read but don't post often. Hell, I think I read JJ for over a full year before I ever posted.
I agree with this.Curly J;1463436 wrote: Okay Justin and the rest of the OC, I have to admit I've never had an issue with F4F, but reading what I've read on this thread I can see why people do. And for him to piss of someone as easy going as Devils Advocate, well something isn't right. I never saw a Mod take himself so Serious, in such a smug way. I only wish us posters were just important as him.
