Lol I feel like we've always agreed on the fact that Weeden should be the starter. Hell, we spent a first rounder on him.BR1986FB;1410699 wrote:We finally agree on something.I'm also in the camp that if he looks totally clueless & sucks, you move on...no third year to "get it."
I've always been of the belief that if the light bulb goes on they could get 5-6 years out of him. He was mediocre last year so he's used one of his "lives" if it clicks this year maybe they get 3-4 more years out of him. If he doesn't, move on. There should be no excuses for him in this offense...sink or swim.SportsAndLady;1410701 wrote:Lol I feel like we've always agreed on the fact that Weeden should be the starter. Hell, we spent a first rounder on him.
Where we've disagreed is a) actually picking him and b) him being the long term future.
BR1986FB;1410702 wrote:I've always been of the belief that if the light bulb goes on they could get 5-6 years out of him. He was mediocre last year so he's used one of his "lives" if it clicks this year maybe they get 3-4 more years out of him. If he doesn't, move on. There should be no excuses for him in this offense...sink or swim.
They will have to have some kind of contingency plan if Weeden craps out. Either a 3rd/4th rounder this year or go "all in" for someone next year.SportsAndLady;1410717 wrote:If hes bad this year, and you're cool with them moving on. Wouldn't you want a QB on the roster now to learn the offense for a year? That's why I am okay with Geno at 6 if hes still there (he won't)
I wasn't saying GO ALL OUT FOR GENO, moreso if he's there he'd be great to have in case Weeden turns to shit.
If not Geno, at least a 3-4th rounder.
He can be elite imo. He was on his way to beign a pro bowler and possibly an all-pro selection last year if he didn't fucking dip into some party favors over the offseason.
OK, I've looked and the rule change, IMHO:BR1986FB;1410746 wrote:T-Rich takes blame for new helmet rule...
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/richardson-takes-blame-helmet-rule-131612608--nfl.html
Because offensive players don't launch themselves to make tackles with their helmet. Dumb rule change.Sonofanump;1410995 wrote:OK, I've looked and the rule change, IMHO:
The defender can not lead with the crown of the helmet, why should the offensive player? Makes sense to me.
Launching is not a foul, it is an indicator of a type of action.Rotinaj;1411007 wrote:Because offensive players don't launch themselves to make tackles with their helmet. Dumb rule change.
best nickname everCommander of Awesome;1411657 wrote:Browns are looking at a a kicker with the nickname, "Kickalicious". SMH
[video=youtube;jDwbjHV8jLo][/video]Commander of Awesome;1411657 wrote:Browns are looking at a a kicker with the nickname, "Kickalicious". SMH
Don't know how he would kick under pressure, but some of that shit was damn impressive.bases_loaded;1411707 wrote:[video=youtube;jDwbjHV8jLo][/video]
Imagine what chud and Norv could do with Witten! Prob have 320 catches for 3k yards! /Browns fan mentalityroyal_k;1411717 wrote:Don't know how he would kick under pressure, but some of that shit was damn impressive.
Davis had 19 receptions all of last season. Jason Witten had 19 in one game.
