GoChiefs;1411941 wrote:Theres a difference between ****ographic and sexually suggestive.

GoChiefs;1411941 wrote:Theres a difference between pornographic and sexually suggestive. Derp. You tried repeatedly to push those boundaries, despite multiple warnings and infractions and a site wide notice about Adsense. Get the fuck over it.

You were never banned for poking fun at mods.

like_that;1411947 wrote:So, who is lollercoaster?

lollercoaster;1411951 wrote:The hero that OhioChatter deserves, but not the one it needs right now... so they'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... an lolfailercoaster.

like_that;1411947 wrote:So, who is lollercoaster?

lollercoaster;1411946 wrote:mods seem to rush to ban people who are toeing the line of appropriate/inappropriate. Yet someone using the real name of an underage rape trial participant, clearly only here to troll a thread about the rape, is not banned two days later. I'm curious about why that is.

GoChiefs;1411970 wrote:So, we should ban someone who's IP's do not match anyone else, because they are using a screen name of someone that has not been arrested or charged with anything?

lollercoaster;1411929 wrote:I assumed that's what he was getting at, maybe not. Regardless, why is someone who uses the real name of one of the underage members of a rape trial for his username, and then clearly tries to troll a thread about the situation not banned 2 days later? This is allowed but posting sexually suggestive gifs or poking fun at mods is an insta-ban.

lollercoaster;1411987 wrote:It's not against the rules to use a random high school student's real name as your screen name? Is it not also obvious that the user's entire intent is to troll a thread about a 16 year old getting raped?

SaltsmanCody;1411992 wrote:Jane is the woman who's home this alleged "rape" happened at. She's also the person who would have to choose to charge herself in the crime as the pros. attorney.

Clearly you are not following the story or you'd know this by now bro

Crimson and Gray Hair;1412086 wrote:This is no longer an alleged rape.

Clearly you are not following the story or you'd know this by now bro

SportsAndLady;1412137 wrote:I'm with the lollercopter...someone needs to ban this clown (saltsman)

Who gives a fuck if he technically hasn't violated any rules. By banning him you're acting in the best interest of the OC.

GoChiefs;1411998 wrote:No

we have no proof as to who the poster is.

lollercoaster;1412225 wrote:It's not against the rules to blatantly troll a serious thread?



Yeah, I'm sure it's the real Cody Saltzman :laugh:

GoChiefs;1412246 wrote:Stranger things have happened. If it is him, by chance, how is it trolling? Christ, you bitch about moderating, but then want us to ban based on assumptions?

GoChiefs;1412246 wrote:If it is him

lollercoaster;1412256 wrote:I don't think Cody is registering on the OC, putting "Cody's #1 fan" as his user title, then trolling a thread about the trial he was called as a witness at.

It's some random user, using a high school student's name as their username, and blatantly trolling a thread about a 16 year old girl getting raped. It's not an assumption, it's the only possible logical conclusion an intelligent person could reach. My question is, why this is being allowed by otherwise very trigger-happy mods? Is the answer you're going to ride with seriously, "because it might be the real Cody Saltzman?"

GoChiefs;1412257 wrote:Of course the answer isn't good enough for you, but I really don't care.

GoChiefs;1412263 wrote:A wise man once said, "No man is more important than the TEAM."

GoChiefs;1412257 wrote:Of course the answer isn't good enough for you, but I really don't care.