You and I both know I was talking about your comments.Devils Advocate;1515358 wrote:Yes. Buggering litlle boys and claiming freedom of religion is despicable.
jmog;1515364 wrote:You and I both know I was talking about your comments.
For 1, messing with children is definitely despicable. However, you are attributing that to this particular priest which is a despicable thing to say.
Can you show me where he said he was mad he wasn't getting paid? If not you just keep being wrong.Devils Advocate;1515393 wrote:Fair enough. But i was responding to the same dipicable preist thst claimed Obama closed his church.when he in fact is truly only mad that he is not getting paid. If our servicemen need to go to mass to prop up their own delusional beliefs, they could go off base and find a church.
Its a navel sub yard, they go month withput gping to church for Christs sake.
lol, what a troll.Devils Advocate;1515418 wrote:Yes, they are scary and responsible for more than even natural disasters.
Devils Advocate;1515393 wrote:Fair enough. But i was responding to the same dipicable preist thst claimed Obama closed his church.when he in fact is truly only mad that he is not getting paid.
Horse shit. The Catholic church is not going to do it for free. If they are so holy and charitable, why would they "contract"He is contracted by the Defense Department to meet the spiritual needs of Catholics, but not now. The chapel doors were locked and the sign said, “Shutdown: No Catholic service till further notice.”
Father Leonard said the following:
“This is our church, Catholics have an expectation and obligation to attend Mass and we were told, ‘No you can’t go to church this week…“ My parishioners were upset. They were angry and dismayed. They couldn’t believe that in America they’d be denied access to Mass by the government.”
You are so full of $H!T and you know it.Devils Advocate;1515531 wrote:H
Horse shit. The Catholic church is not going to do it for free. If they are so holy and charitable, why would they "contract"
There is no need for a church for a mass, and this church like all the others are in it for the money.
yes, I am the advocate of devils.jmog;1515545 wrote:You are so full of $H!T and you know it.
So FOS....Catholic priests make between 15 and 30k /year. If they are assigned to the military, they make their pay grade. Like other people, they have to have money to pay for living expenses...clothes gasoline food etc.. If they are a parish priest they may have housing provided. i know it's difficult for a liberal elitist to understand, but people have a right to charge for services. (and actually make a profit), because if they don't, they will no longer be willing or able to provide those services. Nobody can or should work for nothing just because you think they should.Horse shit. The Catholic church is not going to do it for free. If they are so holy and charitable, why would they "contract"
There is no need for a church for a mass, and this church like all the others are in it for the money.
HitsRus;1515575 wrote: i know it's difficult for a liberal elitist to understand,
lol. What a joke of a post.QuakerOats;1515721 wrote:The unbelievable disgrace of not paying military death benefits should mean the IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION OF CHUCK HAGEL, and the SUPPOSED commander-in-chief.
The complete disdain for our service personnel by this ANTI-AMERICAN regime is TREASONOUS !!!!!!
They can all GO TO HELL!
The Rs have passed at least 3 CRs. It is the Ds that rejected all 3.ptown_trojans_1;1515725 wrote:lol. What a joke of a post.
As the R's championed the shutdown, they have no ground to stand on on complaining what is and what is not shutdown.
Don't like it, tough, sorry, pass a CR.
Oh, you read also how the VA can't go through old claims? Want to cry over that too oh great change you can believe in critic?
Pass a CR!
What a joke.
You have no idea what the hell you are talking about per usual.
Right, right the ones that had no chance of passing the Senate because they defunded the President's biggest achievement. Yeah, that is rational.jmog;1515754 wrote:The Rs have passed at least 3 CRs. It is the Ds that rejected all 3.
Ummm..you want him to stop, but you're perfectly happy with it - see post 1412:ptown_trojans_1;1515760 wrote:Right, right the ones that had no chance of passing the Senate because they defunded the President's biggest achievement. Yeah, that is rational.
Stop with the blame game.
Get your shit together and pass a rational clean CR.
And, by the way, jmog is 100% correct in that Harry won't pass the appropriations bills sent to him by the H.O.R. I also find it interesting that people who've been clamoring for a real budget, and not just a "continuing resolution", are getting them now and the venom spewing from the Left is at peak levels. Huh...the H.O.R. is actually performing its function and you'd think they were all Al Queda trainees according to some on here and the media.As the R's championed the shutdown, they have no ground to stand on on complaining what is and what is not shutdown.
Poll after poll has proven that American's don't want it (ACA/Obamacare). So when one of the 2 sides grows the balls to try to get rid of something that the American people don't want, you blame them?ptown_trojans_1;1515760 wrote:Right, right the ones that had no chance of passing the Senate because they defunded the President's biggest achievement. Yeah, that is rational.
Stop with the blame game.
Get your shit together and pass a rational clean CR.
As a compromise, the Republicans, as I understand it, would accept a one year delay in the individual mandate to match the employer mandate that Mr. Obama delayed in spite of having no legal authority to do so. This is in no way unreasonable, but the Democrats are determined to take away the "Party of No" designation.ptown_trojans_1;1515760 wrote:Right, right the ones that had no chance of passing the Senate because they defunded the President's biggest achievement. Yeah, that is rational.
Stop with the blame game.
Get your shit together and pass a rational clean CR.
Nailed it.queencitybuckeye;1515841 wrote: Anyone who believes this shutdown isn't bipartisan is himself a partisan hack.
ptown_trojans_1;1515760 wrote:Get your shit together and pass a rational clean CR.
queencitybuckeye;1515841 wrote:As a compromise, the Republicans, as I understand it, would accept a one year delay in the individual mandate to match the employer mandate that Mr. Obama delayed in spite of having no legal authority to do so. This is in no way unreasonable, but the Democrats are determined to take away the "Party of No" designation.
ptown_trojans_1;1515725 wrote:lol. What a joke of a post.
